Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 1;13(4):1741-1755.
doi: 10.70252/HCZX4482. eCollection 2020.

A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results

Affiliations

A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results

Marc Keefer et al. Int J Exerc Sci. .

Abstract

The United States Marines Corps (USMC) have installed a Physical Fitness Test (PFT) to measure physical fitness levels and a Combat Fitness Test (CFT) to assess a Marine's functional fitness as it relates to the demands of combat operations. The PFT involves three events; pull-ups/push-ups (PU), two-minute abdominal crunches/sit-ups (AC), and a timed three-mile run (RUN). The CFT also involves three events; Movement to Contact (MTC), two-minute Ammunition Lift (AL), and Maneuver-Under-Fire (MANUF). It is of interest to determine if the PFT and CFT are both necessary. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine the degree of relationships between PFT (PU, AC, RUN, and total) and CFT (MTC, AL, MANUF, and total) scores of active duty Marines. The PFT and CFT scores from 19,678 active duty enlisted USMC males (age 22.5±1.3 years, height 1.77±0.07 m, body mass 79.4±10.3 kg) were analyzed. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated between the PFT and CFT total scores as well as individual events. The PFT mean±sd scores were as follows: PU=18.0±5.0 (pull-ups), AC=111.2±9.0 (repetitions), RUN=1377.0±131.4 sec, PFT total=249.6±29.6. The CFT mean±sd scores were as follows: MTC=172.5±16.3 sec, AL=113.2±10.4 repetitions, MANUF=138.3±17.2 sec, CFT total=271.6±25.6. Moderate significant (p<0.01) correlations were found between: the PFT total and MTC (r=-0.47), PFT total and MANUF (r=-0.42), PFT total and CFT total (r=0.50), RUN and MTC (r=0.46), RUN and CFT total (r=-0.43), & PU and CFT total (r=0.41). Other correlations between variables yielded "no to low" association but were also significant due to the large sample size. Within the parameters of this study, PFT and CFT event scores demonstrated no to moderate correlations suggesting that different fitness characteristics are being assessed and supports the need for both the PFT and CFT assessments.

Keywords: USMC; military; readiness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MANUF layout. Diagram not to scale. All events occur within one (same) lane (~ 7yd wide). *Dimensions are in yards. (25) (Figure reprinted with permission of the USMC).
Figure 2
Figure 2
MANUF Lane markings. Diagram not to scale. formula image= 30 lb Ammo Cans, formula image= Dummy grenade, formula image= Small cone, pylon, or another visible marker. * Dimensions are in yards and pounds. (25) (Figure reprinted with permission of the USMC).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ah Sue R, Harris C, Berning J, Sevene T, Adams KJ, DeBeliso M. Determination of trials needed for measurement consistency of standing long jump in female collegiate volleyball athletes: A brief report. Int J Sports Sci. 2017;7(1):1–5.
    1. AlTarawneh G, Thorn S. A pilot study exploring spreadsheet risk in scientific research. Mar 15, 2017. arXiv [cs.CY]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09785.
    1. Bartlett JL, Phillips J, Galarneau MR. A descriptive study of the U.S. Marine Corps fitness tests 2000–2012. Mil Med. 2015;180(5):513–517. - PubMed
    1. Bear R, Sanders M, Pompili J, Stucky L, Walters A, Simmons J, Terrell D, Lacanilao P, Eagle S, Grier T, DeGroot D, Lovalekar MT, Nindl BC, Kane SF, Depenbrock P. Development of the tactical human optimization, rapid rehabilitation, and reconditioning program military operator readiness assessment for the Special Forces operator. Strength Cond J. 2016;38(6):55–60.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.

LinkOut - more resources