Energy Expenditure and Muscular Recruitment Patterns of Riding a Novel Electrically Powered Skateboard
- PMID: 33414880
- PMCID: PMC7745903
- DOI: 10.70252/TWHF7333
Energy Expenditure and Muscular Recruitment Patterns of Riding a Novel Electrically Powered Skateboard
Abstract
Analysis of metabolic gas exchange and muscular output measures have enabled researchers to index activity intensity and energy expenditure for a myriad of exercises. However, there is no current research that investigates the physiological demands of riding electrically powered skateboards. The aim of this study was to measure the energetic cost and muscular trends of riding a novel electrically powered skateboard engineered to emulate snowboarding on dry-land. While riding the skateboard, eight participants (aged 21-37 years, 1 female) donned a portable breath-by-breath gas analyzer to measure energy expenditure (mean = 12.5, SD = 2 kcal/min), maximum heart rate (mean = 158, SD = 27 bpm), and metabolic equivalent (mean = 10.5, SD = 2 kcal/kg/h). By comparison, snowboarding has a metabolic equivalent (MET) of 8.0. Per the Compendium of Physical Activities guidelines, the predicted MET values for riding an electrically powered skateboard qualifies as vigorous-intensity activity. Four participants additionally wore a surface EMG embedded garment to record the percentage of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC) of lower limb muscle groups. The inner quadriceps had the most pronounced mean peak muscle activation of 145%MVC during frontside and 164%MVC during frontside turns. EMG recordings showed 11.7%MVC higher utilization during backside turns compared to frontside turns while riding the electrically powered skateboard, which is similar to trends observed in alpine snowboarders. Therefore, electrically powered skateboards may be a promising technology for snowboarders and non-snowboarders alike to burn calories and increase physical activity year-round.
Keywords: Exercise; electromyography; indirect calorimetry; metabolic; snowboard.
Figures
References
-
- Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR, Tudor-Locke C, Greer JL, Vezina J, Whitt- Glover MC, Leon AS. 2011 Compendium of physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575–1581. - PubMed
-
- Castro A, Gaupp-Berghausen M, Dons E, Standaert A, Laeremans M, Clark A, Anaya-Boig E, Cole-Hunter T, Avila-Palencia I, Rojas-Ruede D. Physical activity of electric bicycle users compared to conventional bicycle users and non-cyclists: Insights based on health and transport data from an online survey in seven European cities. Transportation Res Interdiscipl Persp. 2019;1
-
- Falda-Buscaiot T, Hintzy F. Comparison of muscle activation pattern between alpine skiing and snowboarding. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;18:1936–1937. - PubMed
-
- Healthy People 2020. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/default.aspx.
-
- Jetté M, Sidney K, Blümchen G. Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing, exercise prescription, and evaluation of functional capacity. Clin Cardiol. 1990;13(8):555–565. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous