Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 1;13(5):1501-1511.
doi: 10.70252/BYXG5350. eCollection 2020.

VO2, Liking, and Relative Reinforcing Value of Cooperative and Competitive Exergame Play in Young Children

Jonathan B Naylor  1 , Beth J Patton  1 , Jacob E Barkley  2
Affiliations

VO2, Liking, and Relative Reinforcing Value of Cooperative and Competitive Exergame Play in Young Children

Jonathan B Naylor et al. Int J Exerc Sci. .

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine physiologic response, liking, and relative reinforcing value (RRV) of children playing an exergame with a friend under two goal structures: competitive and cooperative. A sample of twenty participants (8.7 ± 1.3 years old) and a self-selected friend completed three conditions: rest, competitive, and cooperative play. During the competitive condition, participants played Nintendo Wii Tennis® against their friend. During cooperative play, participants and their friend played together against a computer avatar. During each condition, oxygen consumption (VO2, ml·kg-1·min-1) and liking (visual analog scale) were recorded. After finishing all conditions, children completed an RRV computer task to assess their motivation to play the competitive versus cooperative goal structures. During this task children performed work (button presses) to participate in additional competitive play, cooperative play, or a combination. The output maximum (Omax), or maximum work for each goal structure, was used as the measure of RRV. It was determined that VO2 was significantly (p ≤ 0.001) greater for cooperative and competitive play than rest. Liking was significantly greater for cooperative play than rest (p ≤ 0.001) and competitive play (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between cooperative and competitive play for VO2 or Omax. In conclusion, while liking was greater for the cooperative condition versus competitive, motivation did not differ between goal structures. Further investigation into methods of making physical activity more reinforcing, in addition to well-liked by children, is necessary to optimize this behavior.

Keywords: Physical activity; goal structure; motivation; physically-active video games.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean liking for the three activity conditions (Mean ± SEM). *condition was significantly greater than rest at p ≤ 0.001. † condition was significantly greater than rest and competitive at p < 0.05.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Sports Medicine and Committee on School Health: Organized athletics for preadolescent children. Pediatrics. 1989;84(3):583–4. - PubMed
    1. Barkley JE, Ryan EJ, Bellar D, Bliss MV, Roemmich JN. The variety of exercise equipment and physical activity participation in children. J Sport Behav. 2011;34(2):137–149.
    1. Barkley JE, Salvy SJ, Roemmich JN. The effect of simulated ostracism on physical activity behavior in children. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):659–666. - PubMed
    1. Barkley JE, Salvy SJ, Sanders GJ, Dey S, Von Carlowitz KP, Williamson ML. Peer influence and physical activity behavior in young children: an experimental study. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(2):404–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beets M, Vogel R, Forlaw L, et al. Social support and youth physical activity: the role of provider and type. Am J Health Behav. 2006;30(3):278–289. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources