Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 1;13(7):1770-1782.
doi: 10.70252/PDMX2564. eCollection 2020.

Short Term High-Repetition Back Squat Protocol Does Not Improve 5-km Run Performance

Affiliations

Short Term High-Repetition Back Squat Protocol Does Not Improve 5-km Run Performance

Matthew J Barenie et al. Int J Exerc Sci. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that a novel high-repetition, low-resistance back squat training protocol, designed to stimulate high-intensity interval training, improves 5-km run performance. Fifteen runners [4 male, 11 female; 150 + minutes of endurance exercise/week; age = 22.7 ± 2.0 y; 21.5 ± 2.2 kg/m2 BMI] in this single-group test-retest design completed two weeks of back squats consisting of three sets of 15-24 repetitions at 60% of estimated one-repetition max (1RM), three times per week (1-2 days of rest between sessions). Outcome tests included a 5-km outdoor timed run, laboratory indirect calorimetry to quantify substrate oxidation rates during steady-state submaximal exercise (60% and 70% heart rate max (HRmax)), and estimated 1RM for back squats. Back squat estimated 1RM increased by 20% (58.3 ± 18.5 to 70.2 ± 16.7 kg, P < 0.001). However, 5-km run times due to the back squat protocol did not significantly change (Pre-Squats: 23.9 ± 5.0 vs. Post-Squats: 23.7 ± 4.3 minutes, P = 0.71). Likewise, the squat training program did not significantly alter carbohydrate or lipid oxidation rates during steady-state submaximal exercise at 60% or 70% of HRmax (P values ranged from 0.36 - 0.99). Short term high-repetition back squat training does not appear to impact 5-km run performance or substrate utilization during submaximal exercise.

Keywords: Barbell training; carbohydrate and fat utilization; long-distance running; lower body resistance exercise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant-level 5-km run times from before and after the two week high-repetition back squat training period. Lines represent the changes from pre- to post-squat training for each participant. The solid bars represent the means and the associated values reflect means ± standard deviations. The 5-km runs were performed on an outdoor 400-meter running track. The P-value reflects the statistical significance of the difference between trials.

References

    1. Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Bennekou M, Larsson B, Olesen JL, Crameri R. Effects of resistance training on endurance capacity and muscle fiber composition in young top-level cyclists. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):e298–307. - PubMed
    1. Barker AR, Day J, Smith A, Bond B, Williams CA. The influence of 2 weeks of low-volume high-intensity interval training on health outcomes in adolescent boys. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(8):757–765. - PubMed
    1. Bartlett JD, Hwa Joo C, Jeong T-S, Louhelainen J, Cochran AJ, Gibala MJ. Matched work high-intensity interval and continuous running induce similar increases in PGC-1α mRNA, AMPK, p38, and p53 phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(7):1135–1143. - PubMed
    1. Berger RA. Determination of the resistance load for 1-RM and 10-RM. J Assoc Phys Ment Rehabil. 1961;15:108–110.
    1. Blagrove RC, Howatson G, Hayes PR. Effects of strength training on the physiological determinants of middle- and long-distance running performance: A systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(5):1117–1149. - PMC - PubMed