Lingual versus buccal mucosal graft for augmentation urethroplasty: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes and patient-reported donor site morbidity
- PMID: 33415488
- DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02720-7
Lingual versus buccal mucosal graft for augmentation urethroplasty: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes and patient-reported donor site morbidity
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed at comparing surgical outcomes and patient-reported donor site morbidity between lingual mucosal graft (LMG) and buccal mucosal graft (BMG) through a meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in January 2019 including non-randomized comparative studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT). The assessed data included urethroplasty outcomes, complications, and donor site morbidities such as pain, bleeding, swelling, numbness, difficulty speaking, difficulty eating, mouth opening, and difficulty with tongue protrusion.
Results: A total of 632 patients (LMG 323, BMG 309) from 12 comparative studies (four RCTs and eight non-randomized) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled effect estimates revealed no significant difference on reported surgical outcomes and operative stricture-related complications. The LMG group reported a higher proportion of patients with difficulty speaking (RR 6.96, 95% CI 2.04-23.70) and difficulty with tongue protrusion (RR 12.93, 95% CI 3.07-54.51) within 30 days post-op. In comparison, the BMG group had significantly more incidence of early post-procedural donor site swelling (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.61) and numbness within 30 days post-op (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-0.97) and 3-6 months (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.90) post-op.
Conclusion: The evidence suggests no overall significant difference between LMG and BMG with regard to urethroplasty outcomes at 1-year follow-up. While patients undergoing LMG urethroplasty have a higher chance of experiencing difficulty with speech and difficulty with tongue protrusion within 1 month of surgery, the BMG group is more likely to experience early donor site swelling and mouth opening difficulty within 30 days post-op, as well as oral numbness for up to 6 months.
Keywords: Augmentation urethroplasty; Buccal mucosa; Lingual mucosa; Patient-reported quality of life; Urethral stricture.
Similar articles
-
Lingual versus buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture: a prospective comparative analysis.Int J Urol. 2013 Dec;20(12):1199-203. doi: 10.1111/iju.12158. Epub 2013 Apr 21. Int J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23601029 Clinical Trial.
-
Buccal versus lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for complex hypospadias repair.J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Dec;9(6 Pt A):754-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 23. J Pediatr Urol. 2013. PMID: 23009885 Clinical Trial.
-
Buccal Versus Lingual Mucosa Graft in Anterior Urethroplasty: A Prospective Comparison of Surgical Outcome and Donor Site Morbidity.J Urol. 2016 Jan;195(1):112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.098. Epub 2015 Aug 1. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26241906
-
Lingual mucosal grafts for anterior urethroplasty: a review.BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(8):1052-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08738.x. Epub 2009 Jul 6. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19583725 Review.
-
Nonclosure Versus Closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvest Site: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes.Urology. 2019 Mar;125:213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 22. Urology. 2019. PMID: 30582940
Cited by
-
[Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft for complex ureteral stricture].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Dec 18;56(4):640-645. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.04.016. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024. PMID: 39041559 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply?J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 6;11(7):2064. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072064. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35407672 Free PMC article.
-
Alternatives to oral mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction.Nat Rev Urol. 2023 May;20(5):259-260. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00707-w. Nat Rev Urol. 2023. PMID: 36536071 No abstract available.
-
Buccal mucosa for use in urethral reconstruction: evolution of use over the last 30 years.Front Urol. 2023 May 2;3:1138707. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1138707. eCollection 2023. Front Urol. 2023. PMID: 40778032 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Ventral onlay graft urethroplasty using bladder mucosa in a cat with a urethral stricture.J Vet Med Sci. 2023 Jan 6;85(1):44-48. doi: 10.1292/jvms.22-0296. Epub 2022 Nov 9. J Vet Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 36351592 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chapple C, Andrich D, Atala A et al (2014) SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: the management of anterior urethral stricture disease using substitution urethroplasty. Urology 83:S31-47 - DOI
-
- Korneyev I, Ilyin D, Schultheiss D, Chapple C (2012) The first oral mucosal graft urethroplasty was carried out in the 19th century: the pioneering experience of Kirill Sapezhko (1857–1928). Eur Urol 62:624–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.035 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Humby G, Higgins TT (1941) A one-stage operation for hypospadias. Br J Surg 29:84–92 - DOI
-
- Bürger RA, Müller SC, El-Damanhoury H et al (1992) The buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction: a preliminary report. JURO 147:662–664
-
- Simonato A, Gregori A, Ambruosi C et al (2008) Lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral reconstruction. Eur Urol 54:79–85 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous