Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 May;53(5):907-918.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02720-7. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

Lingual versus buccal mucosal graft for augmentation urethroplasty: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes and patient-reported donor site morbidity

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Lingual versus buccal mucosal graft for augmentation urethroplasty: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes and patient-reported donor site morbidity

Andrew Wang et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 May.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed at comparing surgical outcomes and patient-reported donor site morbidity between lingual mucosal graft (LMG) and buccal mucosal graft (BMG) through a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in January 2019 including non-randomized comparative studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT). The assessed data included urethroplasty outcomes, complications, and donor site morbidities such as pain, bleeding, swelling, numbness, difficulty speaking, difficulty eating, mouth opening, and difficulty with tongue protrusion.

Results: A total of 632 patients (LMG 323, BMG 309) from 12 comparative studies (four RCTs and eight non-randomized) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled effect estimates revealed no significant difference on reported surgical outcomes and operative stricture-related complications. The LMG group reported a higher proportion of patients with difficulty speaking (RR 6.96, 95% CI 2.04-23.70) and difficulty with tongue protrusion (RR 12.93, 95% CI 3.07-54.51) within 30 days post-op. In comparison, the BMG group had significantly more incidence of early post-procedural donor site swelling (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.61) and numbness within 30 days post-op (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-0.97) and 3-6 months (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.90) post-op.

Conclusion: The evidence suggests no overall significant difference between LMG and BMG with regard to urethroplasty outcomes at 1-year follow-up. While patients undergoing LMG urethroplasty have a higher chance of experiencing difficulty with speech and difficulty with tongue protrusion within 1 month of surgery, the BMG group is more likely to experience early donor site swelling and mouth opening difficulty within 30 days post-op, as well as oral numbness for up to 6 months.

Keywords: Augmentation urethroplasty; Buccal mucosa; Lingual mucosa; Patient-reported quality of life; Urethral stricture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chapple C, Andrich D, Atala A et al (2014) SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: the management of anterior urethral stricture disease using substitution urethroplasty. Urology 83:S31-47 - DOI
    1. Korneyev I, Ilyin D, Schultheiss D, Chapple C (2012) The first oral mucosal graft urethroplasty was carried out in the 19th century: the pioneering experience of Kirill Sapezhko (1857–1928). Eur Urol 62:624–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Humby G, Higgins TT (1941) A one-stage operation for hypospadias. Br J Surg 29:84–92 - DOI
    1. Bürger RA, Müller SC, El-Damanhoury H et al (1992) The buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction: a preliminary report. JURO 147:662–664
    1. Simonato A, Gregori A, Ambruosi C et al (2008) Lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral reconstruction. Eur Urol 54:79–85 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources