Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm
- PMID: 33415712
- DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01123-4
Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that the temporary storage and manipulation of depth information (working memory for depth; WMd) is largely different from that of visual information in a 2D context (visual working memory; VWM). Although there has been abundant evidence on VWM showing that cueing a memory item during retention could bias attention to its internal representation and thus improves its memory performance (a retro-cue effect), it is unknown whether such an effect differs for WMd that is nested in a 3D context compared with that in a conventional 2D context. Here, we used a change detection task to investigate the effect of attentional selection on WMd by testing several types of retro-cue. The memory array consisted of items positioned at various stereoscopic depth planes, and a cue was presented during retention. Participants needed to make judgments on whether the depth position of target (one memory item) had changed. Our study showed reliable valid retro-cue benefits but no invalid retro-cue cost, indicating that the relational information may be registered in WMd to prevent a strategical removal of the unattended item. There was also a slight improvement in memory performance for cueing depth order compared with that for cueing other feature dimensions or 2D locations. The attentional effect on memory representation in a 3D context is different from that in a 2D context, and the divergence may suggest the distinctive nature of working memory for depth.
Keywords: Attention; Retro-cue effect; Stereoscopic depth; Working memory.
Similar articles
-
Spatial attention based on 2D location and relative depth order modulates visual working memory in a 3D environment.Br J Psychol. 2023 Feb;114(1):112-131. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12599. Epub 2022 Sep 25. Br J Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36161427
-
Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):641-646. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1533-7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019. PMID: 30276638
-
Comparing retro-cue benefit mechanisms in visual working memory: completely valid vs. highly valid retro-cues.BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 7;12(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02145-2. BMC Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39511694 Free PMC article.
-
In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):1839-60. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016. PMID: 27098647 Review.
-
Can we throw information out of visual working memory and does this leave informational residue in long-term memory?Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 8;5:294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00294. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24782798 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 14;42(37):7110-7120. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022. Epub 2022 Aug 4. J Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35927036 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for the Beneficial Effect of Reward on Working Memory: A Meta-Analytic Study.J Intell. 2024 Sep 11;12(9):88. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12090088. J Intell. 2024. PMID: 39330467 Free PMC article.
-
The Short-Term Retention of Depth.Vision (Basel). 2021 Dec 8;5(4):59. doi: 10.3390/vision5040059. Vision (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34941654 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Astle, D. E., Summerfield, J., Griffin, I., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Orienting attention to locations in mental representations. Attention, Perception, &Psychophysics, 74, 146–162. - DOI
-
- Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. - DOI
-
- Berryhill, M. E., Richmond, L. L., Shay, C. S., & Olson, I. R. (2012). Shifting attention among working memory representations: Testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 426–438. - DOI
-
- Blakemore, C. (1970). The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. The Journal of Physiology, 211(3), 599–622. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009296 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Chunharas, C., Rademaker, R. L., Sprague, T. C., & Brady, T. F. (2019) Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance. Journal of Vision, 19(1), 4, 1–16.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources