Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm
- PMID: 33415712
- DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01123-4
Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that the temporary storage and manipulation of depth information (working memory for depth; WMd) is largely different from that of visual information in a 2D context (visual working memory; VWM). Although there has been abundant evidence on VWM showing that cueing a memory item during retention could bias attention to its internal representation and thus improves its memory performance (a retro-cue effect), it is unknown whether such an effect differs for WMd that is nested in a 3D context compared with that in a conventional 2D context. Here, we used a change detection task to investigate the effect of attentional selection on WMd by testing several types of retro-cue. The memory array consisted of items positioned at various stereoscopic depth planes, and a cue was presented during retention. Participants needed to make judgments on whether the depth position of target (one memory item) had changed. Our study showed reliable valid retro-cue benefits but no invalid retro-cue cost, indicating that the relational information may be registered in WMd to prevent a strategical removal of the unattended item. There was also a slight improvement in memory performance for cueing depth order compared with that for cueing other feature dimensions or 2D locations. The attentional effect on memory representation in a 3D context is different from that in a 2D context, and the divergence may suggest the distinctive nature of working memory for depth.
Keywords: Attention; Retro-cue effect; Stereoscopic depth; Working memory.
References
-
- Astle, D. E., Summerfield, J., Griffin, I., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Orienting attention to locations in mental representations. Attention, Perception, &Psychophysics, 74, 146–162. - DOI
-
- Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. - DOI
-
- Berryhill, M. E., Richmond, L. L., Shay, C. S., & Olson, I. R. (2012). Shifting attention among working memory representations: Testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 426–438. - DOI
-
- Blakemore, C. (1970). The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. The Journal of Physiology, 211(3), 599–622. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009296 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Chunharas, C., Rademaker, R. L., Sprague, T. C., & Brady, T. F. (2019) Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance. Journal of Vision, 19(1), 4, 1–16.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
