Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;42(7):2018-2031.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.25342. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

Discriminating subcortical ischemic vascular disease and Alzheimer's disease by diffusion kurtosis imaging in segregated thalamic regions

Affiliations

Discriminating subcortical ischemic vascular disease and Alzheimer's disease by diffusion kurtosis imaging in segregated thalamic regions

Min-Chien Tu et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 May.

Abstract

Differentiating between subcortical ischemic vascular disease (SIVD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and normal cognition (NC) remains a challenge, and reliable neuroimaging biomarkers are needed. The current study, therefore, investigated the discriminative ability of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) metrics in segregated thalamic regions and compare with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics. Twenty-three SIVD patients, 30 AD patients, and 24 NC participants underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging. The DKI metrics including mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (Kaxial ) and radial kurtosis (Kradial ) and the DTI metrics including diffusivity and fractional anisotropy (FA) were measured within the whole thalamus and segregated thalamic subregions. Strategic correlations by group, thalamo-frontal connectivity, and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) were used to demonstrate the discriminative ability of DKI for SIVD, AD, and NC. Whole and segregated thalamus analysis suggested that DKI metrics are less affected by white matter hyperintensities compared to DTI metrics. Segregated thalamic analysis showed that MK and Kradial were notably different between SIVD and AD/NC. The correlation analysis between Kaxial and MK showed a nonsignificant relationship in SIVD group, a trend of negative relationship in AD group, and a significant positive relationship in NC group. A wider spatial distribution of thalamo-frontal connectivity differences across groups was shown by MK compared to FA. CDA showed a discriminant power of 97.4% correct classification using all DKI metrics. Our findings support that DKI metrics could be more sensitive than DTI metrics to reflect microstructural changes within the gray matter, hence providing complementary information for currently outlined pathogenesis of SIVD and AD.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; canonical discriminant analysis; dementia; diffusion kurtosis imaging; diffusion tensor imaging; subcortical ischemic vascular disease; thalamus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(a) Segregated thalamic subregions used in this study. (b) The final ventricle‐masked segregated thalamus atlas was overlaid onto the averaged b0 images across all three groups (SIVD, subcortical ischemic vascular disease; AD, Alzheimer's disease; NC, normal cognition)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Correlation analysis between (a–c) FA and MD as well as (d–f) MK and MD across all three groups (SIVD, subcortical ischemic vascular disease; AD, Alzheimer's disease; NC, normal cognition; MD, mean diffusivity; FA, fractional anisotropy; MK, mean kurtosis)
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Correlation analysis among DTI and DKI metrics across the three groups. (a–c) Correlations between MD and D axial/D radial, and (d–f) Correlations between MK and K axial/K radial. DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; DKI, diffusion kurtosis imaging; SIVD, subcortical ischemic vascular disease; AD, Alzheimer's disease; NC, normal cognition; D axial, axial diffusivity; D radial, radial diffusivity; MD, mean diffusivity; FA, fractional anisotropy; K axial, axial kurtosis; K radial, radial kurtosis; MK, mean kurtosis
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Between‐group comparisons of (a) FA, (b) MK, (c) K axial, and (d) K radial in segregated thalamic regions. Thin brackets indicate between‐group differences with significant p values <.05 after controlling for age and education (FDR uncorrected). Asterisks (*) indicate between‐group differences with significant p values <.05 after controlling for age and education (FDR corrected). Daggers () indicate significant between‐group differences with significant p values <.05 noted after controlling for age, education, and the Fazekas scale. SIVD, subcortical ischemic vascular disease; AD, Alzheimer's disease; NC, normal cognition; DKI, diffusion kurtosis imaging; FA, fractional anisotropy; MK, mean kurtosis; K axial, axial kurtosis; K radial, radial kurtosis; PUL, pulvinar; ANT, anterior; MedioD, mediodorsal; VLD, ventral–lateral–dorsal; C, central; VA, ventral‐anterior; VLV, ventral–lateral–ventral; L, left; R = right
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Diffusivity metrics, (a) D axial, (b) D radial, and (c) MD, in segregated thalamic regions among normal cognition (NC, n = 24), Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 30), and subcortical ischemic vascular disease (SIVD, n = 23) groups. Thin brackets indicate between‐group differences with significant p values <.05 after controlling for age and education (FDR uncorrected). Asterisks (*) indicate between‐group differences with significant p values <.05 after controlling for age and education (FDR corrected). No significant between‐group differences with significant p values <.05 is noted after controlling for age, education, and the Fazekas scale. MD, mean diffusivity; D axial, axial diffusivity; D radial, radial diffusivity; PUL, pulvinar; ANT, anterior; MedioD, mediodorsal; VLD, ventral–lateral–dorsal; C, central; VA, ventral‐anterior; VLV, ventral–lateral–ventral; L, left; R, right
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Between‐group comparisons of thalamo‐frontal connectivity. (a) FA connectivity and (b) MK connectivity. Asterisks (*) indicate between‐group differences with significant p values <.05 after controlling for age and education (FDR corrected). No significant between‐group differences with significant p values <.05 are noted after controlling for age, education, and the Fazekas scale. ANT, anterior; MedioD, mediodorsal; VA, ventral‐anterior; SFG, the superior frontal gyrus; R, right; L, left; FA, fractional anisotropy; MK, mean kurtosis
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Canonical discriminant analysis using DKI metrics. SIVD, subcortical ischemic vascular disease; AD, Alzheimer's disease; NC, normal cognition

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Battistella, G. , Najdenovska, E. , Maeder, P. , Ghazaleh, N. , Daducci, A. , Thiran, J. P. , … Fornari, E. (2017). Robust thalamic nuclei segmentation method based on local diffusion magnetic resonance properties. Brain Structure & Function, 222(5), 2203–2216. 10.1007/s00429-016-1336-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behrens, T. E. , Johansen‐Berg, H. , Woolrich, M. W. , Smith, S. M. , Wheeler‐Kingshott, C. A. , Boulby, P. A. , … Matthews, P. M. (2003). Non‐invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 750–757. 10.1038/nn1075 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benjamini, Y. , & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
    1. Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29(3), 162–173. - PubMed
    1. Erkinjuntti, T. , Inzitari, D. , Pantoni, L. , Wallin, A. , Scheltens, P. , Rockwood, K. , … Desmond, D. W. (2000). Research criteria for subcortical vascular dementia in clinical trials. In Advances in Dementia Research (pp. 23–30). Vienna, Austria: Springer. - PubMed

Publication types