Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;45(5):1191-1197.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04927-w. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

A new computed tomography scoring system to assess osteochondral allograft transplantation for the knee: inter-observer and intra-observer agreement

Affiliations

A new computed tomography scoring system to assess osteochondral allograft transplantation for the knee: inter-observer and intra-observer agreement

Pablo Eduardo Gelber et al. Int Orthop. 2021 May.

Abstract

Aim of the study: To describe a new semiquantitative computed tomography (CT) scoring system for multi-feature analysis of cartilage defect repair by osteochondral allografts for the knee and to assess its intra-observer and inter-observer variability.

Method: A semiquantitative assessment CT osteochondral allograft (ACTOCA) scoring system was designed based on fresh osteochondral allograft transplantations for the knee. The system includes five CT features: density relative to host bone, integration at the host-graft junction, surface percentage with a discernible cleft at the host-graft junction, cystic changes, and intra-articular fragments. Inter-observer variability was calculated by three observers blinded to the patient's medical history and treatment. Intra-observer variability was also determined.

Results: Inter-observer agreement was moderate to substantial for all CT score components and intra-observer agreement was moderate to almost perfect for all CT score components (κ > 0.5, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The ACTOCA score is a reliable tool to evaluate integration of osteochondral allograft transplantations. It provides an accurate evaluation of bone changes and may help to standardize CT scan reports following osteochondral allograft transplantation for the knee.

Keywords: CT scoring system; Cartilage repair; Fresh OCA; Osteochondral allograft; Transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heir S, Nerhus TK, Røtterud JH et al (2010) Focal cartilage defects in the knee impair quality of life as much as severe osteoarthritis: a comparison of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in 4 patient categories scheduled for knee surgery. Am J Sports Med 38:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509352157 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chahla J, Stone J, Mandelbaum BR (2019) How to manage cartilage injuries? Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg 35:2771–2773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.021 - DOI
    1. Gross AE, Kim W, Las Heras F et al (2008) Fresh osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects: long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1863–1870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0282-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Marlovits S, Striessnig G, Resinger CT et al (2004) Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 52:310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Windt TS, Welsch GH, Brittberg M et al (2013) Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 41:1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512473258 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources