Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;43(5):1509-1520.
doi: 10.1002/hed.26601. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

Examining the relationship of immunotherapy and wound complications following flap reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer

Affiliations

Examining the relationship of immunotherapy and wound complications following flap reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer

Ashley C Mays et al. Head Neck. 2021 May.

Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy agents are used to treat advanced head and neck lesions. We aim to elucidate relationship between immunotherapy and surgical wound complications.

Methods: Retrospective multi-institutional case series evaluating patients undergoing ablative and flap reconstructive surgery and immunotherapy treatment.

Main outcome: wound complications.

Results: Eight-two (62%) patients received preoperative therapy, 89 (67%) postoperative, and 33 (25%) in both settings. Forty-one (31%) patients had recipient site complications, 12 (9%) had donor site. Nineteen (14%) had major recipient site complications, 22 (17%) had minor. There was no statistically significant difference in complications based on patient or tumor-specific variables. Preoperative therapy alone demonstrated increased major complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, p = 0.04), and trend to more donor site complications (OR 7.4, p = 0.06), however treatment in both preoperative and postoperative therapy was not.

Conclusions: Preoperative immunotherapy may be associated with increased wound complications. Controlled studies are necessary to delineate this association and potential risks of therapy.

Keywords: free flap reconstruction; head and neck cancer; immunotherapy; wound complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dobosz P, Dzieciatkowski T. The intriguing history of cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2965. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saleh K, Eid R, Haddad FG, Khalife-Saleh N, Kourie HR. New developments in the management of head and neck cancer—Impact of pembrolizumab. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:295–303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn JW, Shalabi D, Correa-Selm LM, Dasgeb B, Nikbakht N, Cha J. Impaired wound healing secondary to bevacizumab. Int Wound J. 2019;16(4):1009–1012. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barami K, Fernandes R. Incidence, risk factors and management of delayed wound dehiscence after craniotomy for tumor resection. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(6):854–857. - PubMed
    1. Hwang V, Mendez E, Chow LQM, et al. Wound complications in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas after anti-PD-1 therapy. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(12):E428–E433. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms