Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for Treatment-Naïve Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase II Trial by the Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM-1402)
- PMID: 33417511
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.00550
Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for Treatment-Naïve Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase II Trial by the Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM-1402)
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the combination of nivolumab (nivo) plus ipilimumab (ipi) as a first-line therapy with respect to the 12-month overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) who are not eligible for liver resection.
Methods: This was a single-arm, phase II trial led by the Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM) on nivo plus ipi for systemic treatment-naïve patients of age > 18 years, with histologically confirmed MUM, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-PS 0/1, and confirmed progressive metastatic disease (M1). Nivo (1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) and ipi (3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) were administered during four inductions, followed by nivo (3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks) until progressive disease, toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary end point was 12-month OS. OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate were evaluated every 6 weeks using RECIST (v1.1). Safety was also evaluated. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models comprising relevant clinical factors were used to evaluate the potential association with response to treatment and survival. Cytokines were quantified in serum samples for their putative role in immune modulation/angiogenesis and/or earlier evidence of involvement in immunotherapy.
Results: A total of 52 patients with a median age of 59 years (range, 26-84 years) were enrolled. Overall, 78.8%, 56%, and 32% of patients had liver M1, extra-liver M1, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Stable disease was the most common outcome (51.9%). The primary end point was 12-month OS, which was 51.9% (95% CI, 38.3 to 65.5). The median OS and PFS were 12.7 months and 3.0 months, respectively. PFS was influenced by higher LDH values.
Conclusions: Nivo plus ipi in the first-line setting for MUM showed a modest improvement in OS over historical benchmarks of chemotherapy, with a manageable toxicity profile.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02626962.
Comment in
-
Dual Immunological Checkpoint Blockade for Uveal Melanoma.J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 20;39(6):554-556. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03274. Epub 2021 Jan 8. J Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33417487 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Retrospective multicenter analysis of real-life toxicity and outcome of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic uveal melanoma.Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7):oyaf173. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173. Oncologist. 2025. PMID: 40554682 Free PMC article.
-
Nivolumab plus relatlimab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results from the open-label, randomised, phase II FRACTION-RCC trial.ESMO Open. 2024 Dec;9(12):104073. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104073. Epub 2024 Dec 5. ESMO Open. 2024. PMID: 39642635 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Survival outcomes and independent response assessment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: 42-month follow-up of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial.J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Jul;8(2):e000891. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000891. J Immunother Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32661118 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Risks and benefits of reinduction ipilimumab/nivolumab in melanoma patients previously treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab.J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Oct;9(10):e003395. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003395. J Immunother Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34702752 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy compared to nivolumab monotherapy in advanced cancers (excluding melanoma): a systemic review and meta-analysis.J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2024 May 6;36(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s43046-024-00218-2. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2024. PMID: 38705953
Cited by
-
Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Patterns of Response and Survival According to the Presence of Hepatic and Extrahepatic Metastasis.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 4;13(13):3359. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133359. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34283061 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase in patients with uveal melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibition.Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Sep 5;15(17):8770-8781. doi: 10.18632/aging.204996. Epub 2023 Sep 5. Aging (Albany NY). 2023. PMID: 37671944 Free PMC article.
-
Immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 3;14(1):7887. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55675-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38570507 Free PMC article.
-
Immunotherapy response and resistance in patients with advanced uveal melanoma: a retrospective cohort study.Clin Exp Med. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):234. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01497-8. Clin Exp Med. 2024. PMID: 39352553 Free PMC article.
-
Tebentafusp for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma.Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2022 Oct;22(10):1017-1027. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2124971. Epub 2022 Sep 19. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2022. PMID: 36102132 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials