A Comprehensive Analysis of Baseline Clinical Characteristics and Biomarkers Associated with Outcome in Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab
- PMID: 33418936
- PMCID: PMC7825041
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020168
A Comprehensive Analysis of Baseline Clinical Characteristics and Biomarkers Associated with Outcome in Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab
Abstract
Background: Pembrolizumab improves the survival of patients with advanced melanoma. A comprehensive analysis of baseline variables that predict the benefit of pembrolizumab monotherapy has not been conducted.
Methods: Survival data of patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with pembrolizumab in a single university hospital were collected. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to correlate baseline clinical, laboratory, and radiologic characteristics and NanoString IO360 gene expression profiling (GEP) with survival.
Results: 183 patients were included (stage IV 85.2%, WHO performance status ≥1 31.1%; pembrolizumab first-line 25.7%), of whom 112 underwent baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging, 58 had circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessments, and GEP was available in 27 patients. Active brain metastases, a higher number of metastatic sites, lower albumin and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, higher total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), and higher ctDNA levels were associated with worse survival. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 2ULN (upper limit of normal), CRP ≥ 10ULN, or ALC < 750/mm3 delineate a subpopulation where treatment with pembrolizumab is futile. A TMTV ≥ 80 mL encompassed 17/21 patients with LDH ≥ 2ULN, CRP ≥ 10ULN, or ALC < 750/mm3. No significant associations were observed between baseline GEP scores and survival.
Conclusion: Multiple baseline variables correlate with survival on pembrolizumab. TMTV is a more comprehensive baseline biomarker than CRP, LDH, or ALC in predicting the futility of pembrolizumab.
Keywords: advanced melanoma; biomarkers; immunotherapy; multivariate analysis; pembrolizumab.
Conflict of interest statement
Gil Awada: consulting or advisory role—Novartis; speaker’s bureau—Novartis; research funding—Novartis (institutional), Pfizer (institutional); travel, accommodation, and expenses—Astellas Pharma, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer. Yanina Jansen: travel, accommodation, and expenses—Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer. Julia Katharina Schwarze: travel, accommodation, and expenses—MSD, Amgen. Sarah Warren: employment—NanoString Technologies; stock and other ownership interests: NanoString Technologies. Kelly Schats: employment—HistoGeneX. Pieter-Jan van Dam: employment—HistoGeneX. Mark Kockx: employment—HistoGeneX; leadership—HistoGeneX; stock and other ownership—HistoGeneX; consulting or advisory role—AstraZeneca, Roche, Ventana Medical Systems; travel, accommodation, and expenses—AstraZeneca, Roche, Ventana Medical Systems. Marleen Keyaerts: research funding—senior clinical investigator mandate by Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO), Precirix (institutional); patents, royalties, other intellectual property—Vrije Universiteit Brussel (institutional). Teofila Seremet: employment—Johnson & Johnson (family member); consulting or advisory role—Novartis; speaker’s bureau—Novartis; travel, accommodation, expenses—GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis. Anne Rogiers: honoraria—Janssen-Cilag, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD. Bart Neyns: honoraria—Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, AstraZeneca; consulting or advisory role—Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer/EMD Serono, Roche, Sanofi; speaker’s bureau—Novartis; research funding—Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Stichting tegen Kanker, Kom op tegen Kanker, Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; travel, accommodation, expenses—Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Roche. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Robert C., Ribas A., Schachter J., Arance A., Grob J.J., Mortier L., Daud A., Carlino M.S., McNeil C.M., Lotem M., et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): Post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1239–1251. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30388-2. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jansen Y.J.L., Rozeman E.A., Mason R., Goldinger S.M., Geukes Foppen M.H., Hoejberg L., Schmidt H., van Thienen J.V., Haanen J., Tiainen L., et al. Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in the absence of disease progression or treatment limiting toxicity: Clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma. Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:1154–1161. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz110. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Long G., Schachter J., Ribas A., Arance A., Grob J. 4-year survival and outcomes after cessation of pembrolizumab (pembro) after 2-years in patients (pts) with ipilimumab (ipi)-naive advanced melanoma in KEYNOTE-006. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36:9503. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.9503. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
