Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 6;10(2):179.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10020179.

Women with a History of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Are a High-Risk Population for Adverse Obstetrical Outcome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Women with a History of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Are a High-Risk Population for Adverse Obstetrical Outcome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Emma Rasmark Roepke et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), defined as three or more consecutive miscarriages, is hypothesized to share some of the same pathogenic factors as placenta-associated disorders. It has been hypothesized that a defect implantation causes pregnancy loss, while a partially impaired implantation may lead to late pregnancy complications. The aim of this retrospective register-based cohort study was to study the association between RPL and such disorders including pre-eclampsia, stillbirth, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, preterm birth and placental abruption. Women registered with childbirth(s) in the Swedish Medical Birth Register (MFR) were included in the cohort. Pregnancies of women diagnosed with RPL (exposed) in the National Patient Register (NPR), were compared with pregnancies of women without RPL (unexposed/reference). Obstetrical outcomes, in the first pregnancy subsequent to the diagnosis of RPL (n = 4971), were compared with outcomes in reference-pregnancies (n = 57,410). Associations between RPL and placental dysfunctional disorders were estimated by odds ratios (AORs) adjusting for confounders, with logistic regression. RPL women had an increased risk for pre-eclampsia (AOR 1.45; 95% CI; 1.24-1.69), stillbirth <37 gestational weeks (GWs) (AOR 1.92; 95% CI; 1.22-3.02), SGA birth (AOR 1.97; 95% CI; 1.42-2.74), preterm birth (AOR 1.46; 95% CI; 1.20-1.77), and placental abruption <37 GWs (AOR 2.47; 95% CI; 1.62-3.76) compared with pregnancies by women without RPL. Women with RPL had an increased risk of pregnancy complications associated with placental dysfunction. This risk population is, therefore, in need of improved antenatal surveillance.

Keywords: intrauterine growth restriction; placental abruption; pre-eclampsia; preterm birth; recurrent pregnancy loss; stillbirth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL. Atik R.B., Christiansen O.B., Elson J., Kolte A.M., Lewis S., Middeldorp S., Nelen W., Peramo B., Quenby S., et al. ESHRE guideline: Recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum. Reprod. Open. 2018;2018:hoy004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: A committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 2013;99:63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Regan L., Backos M., Rai R. RCOG Green-Top Guidline No. 17. The Investigation and Treatment of Couples with Recurrent First-Trimester and Second-Trimester Miscarriage. RCOG; London, UK: 2011.
    1. Toth B., Würfel W., Bohlmann M., Zschocke J., Rudnik-Schöneborn S., Nawroth F., Schleußner E., Rogenhofer N., Wischmann T., von Wolff M., et al. Recurrent miscarriage: Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF registry number 015/050) Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018;78:364–381. doi: 10.1055/a-0586-4568. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christiansen O.B. Epidemiology of recurrent pregnancy loss. In: Carp H., editor. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Causes, Controversies and Treatment. Informa Healthcare; London, UK: 2007. pp. 1–13.

LinkOut - more resources