Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 6;22(2):512.
doi: 10.3390/ijms22020512.

Chromatin Manipulation and Editing: Challenges, New Technologies and Their Use in Plants

Affiliations
Review

Chromatin Manipulation and Editing: Challenges, New Technologies and Their Use in Plants

Kateryna Fal et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

An ongoing challenge in functional epigenomics is to develop tools for precise manipulation of epigenetic marks. These tools would allow moving from correlation-based to causal-based findings, a necessary step to reach conclusions on mechanistic principles. In this review, we describe and discuss the advantages and limits of tools and technologies developed to impact epigenetic marks, and which could be employed to study their direct effect on nuclear and chromatin structure, on transcription, and their further genuine role in plant cell fate and development. On one hand, epigenome-wide approaches include drug inhibitors for chromatin modifiers or readers, nanobodies against histone marks or lines expressing modified histones or mutant chromatin effectors. On the other hand, locus-specific approaches consist in targeting precise regions on the chromatin, with engineered proteins able to modify epigenetic marks. Early systems use effectors in fusion with protein domains that recognize a specific DNA sequence (Zinc Finger or TALEs), while the more recent dCas9 approach operates through RNA-DNA interaction, thereby providing more flexibility and modularity for tool designs. Current developments of "second generation", chimeric dCas9 systems, aiming at better targeting efficiency and modifier capacity have recently been tested in plants and provided promising results. Finally, recent proof-of-concept studies forecast even finer tools, such as inducible/switchable systems, that will allow temporal analyses of the molecular events that follow a change in a specific chromatin mark.

Keywords: CRISPR-dCas9; chemical inhibitors; epigenome editing; histone marks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of epigenetic engineering approaches to study gene function and chromatin modifications at specific loci. (A) ZF-based editing tool. In this approach, the fusion of several Zn finger domains forms a polydactyl system that targets a specific DNA sequence. Direct fusion to a chromatin modifier (CM) can then trigger chromatin modifications such as methylation/demethylation of either DNA or histones in nucleosomes, or acetylation/deacetylation of histones nearby the target site. (B) TALE-based editing tool. The TALE (Transcription Activator-Like Effectors) approach also uses customizable DBDs to target a specific DNA sequence as well as a direct fusion to a CM to induce chromatin modifications nearby the target site. (C) First generation of dCas9 tools to modify chromatin at specific loci. This approach is based on the property of a guide RNA (gRNA) to target a complementary DNA region of interest. The gRNA recruits the dead Cas9 (dCas9) protein which is directly fused to a CM. (D) Second generation of dCas9 tools with the MS2 strategy. The MS2 scaffold RNAs are recognized by MCP proteins fused to CMs, thus enhancing effector capacity. (E) Second generation of dCas9 tools with the SunTag strategy. The dCas9 is fused to a multicopy antigen which is recognized by an antibody fused to TMs or CMs, thus amplifying effector capacity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Luger K., Mäder A.W., Richmond R.K., Sargent D.F., Richmond T.J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nat. Cell Biol. 1997;389:251–260. doi: 10.1038/38444. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kornberg R.D., Lorch Y. Twenty-Five Years of the Nucleosome, Fundamental Particle of the Eukaryote Chromosome. Cell. 1999;98:285–294. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81958-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chodavarapu R.K., Feng S., Bernatavichute Y.V., Chen P.-Y., Stroud H., Yu Y., Hetzel J.A., Kuo F., Kim J., Cokus S.J., et al. Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;466:388–392. doi: 10.1038/nature09147. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luger K., Dechassa M.L., Tremethick D.J. New insights into nucleosome and chromatin structure: An ordered state or a disordered affair? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:436–447. doi: 10.1038/nrm3382. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vergara Z., Gutierrez C. Emerging roles of chromatin in the maintenance of genome organization and function in plants. Genome Biol. 2017;18:96. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1236-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed