Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 20;7(12):309.
doi: 10.3390/children7120309.

Relevance of Biomarkers Currently in Use or Research for Practical Diagnosis Approach of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis

Affiliations
Review

Relevance of Biomarkers Currently in Use or Research for Practical Diagnosis Approach of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis

Maura-Adelina Hincu et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is defined as an invasive infection that occurs in the first 72 h of life. The incidence of EOS varies from 0.5-2% live births in developed countries, up to 9.8% live births in low resource settings, generating a high mortality rate, especially in extremely low birth weight neonates. Clinical signs are nonspecific, leading to a late diagnosis and high mortality. Currently, there are several markers used for sepsis evaluation, such as hematological indices, acute phase reactants, cytokines, which by themselves do not show acceptable sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of EOS in neonates. Newer and more selective markers have surfaced recently, such as presepsin and endocan, but they are currently only in the experimental research stages. This comprehensive review article is based on the role of biomarkers currently in use or in the research phase from a basic, translational, and clinical viewpoint that helps us to improve the quality of neonatal early-onset sepsis diagnosis and management.

Keywords: acute phase reactant; biomarker; cytokine; early-onset sepsis; endocan; newborn; presepsin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the selection process of the review articles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of common and developing biomarkers for neonatal early-onset sepsis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Russell A.R.B., Kumar R. Early onset neonatal sepsis: Diagnostic dilemmas and practical management. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F350–F354. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306193. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zea-Vera A., Ochoa T.J. Challenges in the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis. J. Trop. Pediatrics. 2015;61:1–13. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmu079. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boettiger M., Tyer-Viola L., Hagan J. Nurses’ Early Recognition of Neonatal Sepsis. JOGNN. 2017;46:834–845. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.08.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Puopolo K.M., Escobar G.J. Early-onset sepsis: A predictive model based on maternal risk factors. Curr. Opin. Pediatrics. 2013;25:161–166. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835e1f96. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sgro M., Yudin M.H., Lee S., Sankaran K., Tran D., Campbell D. Early-onset neonatal sepsis: It is not only group B streptococcus. Paediatr. Child Health. 2011;16:269. doi: 10.1093/pch/16.5.269. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources