Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;21(2):e126-e131.
doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0817. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

COVID-19 emergency department discharges: an outcome study

Affiliations

COVID-19 emergency department discharges: an outcome study

David Lanham et al. Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Pressure on acute medical services in the pandemic mandated an assertive emergency department (ED) discharge policy. Given the potential for subsequent deterioration and growing appreciation of complications relating to COVID-19 infection, this follow up study was instigated to provide clinical reassurance that discharged patients had followed a safe clinical course. 199 patients discharged from the ED of our central London hospital were identified over a 20-day period at the height of the pandemic in April 2020. 44 had already reattended ED and 12 had been admitted. At 2-week telephone follow-up, 14 patients were identified who required urgent recall for assessment. At 4-week telephone follow-up, 87 patients were identified with persistent symptoms requiring face to face review. A COVID-19 follow-up clinic was therefore established to provide multi-professional review and diagnostics. 65 patients attended for this assessment. This is the first report on outcomes in COVID-19 infected patients discharged from an ED. It highlights the importance of safety-netting after discharge, the difficulty in predicting which patients might deteriorate and the need for appropriate follow up services.

Keywords: COVID-19; ED discharge policy; outcomes; safety-net.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Numbers of patients contacted and reviewed.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Chest X-ray changes at initial presentation to the emergency department.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
6-week follow-up graphs. a) Percentage subjective recovery at 6 weeks. b) Breathlessness scores during peak illness and at 6 weeks.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Comparing C-reactive protein and D-dimer in single attendances vs representing to emergency department and subsequently discharged and representing and being admitted.

References

    1. Leading Healthcare . 77.8% of NHS 111 calls NOT advised to go to Emergency Department. www.leadinghealthcare.co.uk/2020/03/11/77-8-of-nhs-111-calls-not-advised....
    1. Dalton J. Callers to NHS 111 phone line wait hours and get cut off without being able to speak to nurse. Independent, 13 March 2020. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-uk-symptoms-nhs-111-....
    1. Esakandari H, Nabi-Afjadi M, Fakkari-Afjadi J, et al. . A comprehensive review of COVID-19 characteristics. BiolProced Online 2020;22:19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, et al. . Post discharge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: A cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol 2020, in press ( 10.1002/jmv.26368). - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Management of the long-term effects of COVID-19. NICE guideline [NG188]. NICE, 2020. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-ng10179. - PubMed