Factors affecting consultant attitudes to undertaking undergraduate medical student teaching in the UK: a systematic review
- PMID: 33419916
- PMCID: PMC7798658
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042653
Factors affecting consultant attitudes to undertaking undergraduate medical student teaching in the UK: a systematic review
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review aimed to explore consultant attitudes towards teaching undergraduate medical students in the UK.
Design: Systematic review.
Methodology: Standard systematic review methodology was followed. MEDLINE, EMBASE and OpenGrey were searched from inception to August 2019 to identify studies exploring senior doctors' attitudes towards teaching undergraduate medical students. Two reviewers independently carried out key methodological steps including study screening/selection, quality assessment and data extraction. A narrative synthesis was undertaken.
Results: Five studies were included in the review dating 2003-2015. Two studies used questionnaires, and three used focus groups/semistructured interviews. Key findings identified across all studies were consultants generally found teaching undergraduate medical students enjoyable, and consultants identified time constraints as a barrier to teaching. Other findings were consultants feeling there was a lack of recognition for time spent teaching, and a lack of training/guidance regarding teaching students.
Conclusions: This is the first systematic review to explore senior hospital doctors' attitudes towards teaching undergraduate medical students. Despite these five studies spanning 12 years, the same attitudes and issues regarding teaching are identified by all, suggesting lack of time particularly is a persistent problem regarding consultant-based teaching. An anecdotal impression is that consultants are no longer as enthusiastic about teaching as they once were, but it is evident over the 12 years of these studies that enjoyment levels, and presumably enthusiasm, have not changed significantly.
Keywords: education & training (see medical education & training); medical education & training; qualitative research.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Department of Health The NHS plan. A plan for investment. A plan for reform. London: Stationery Office, 2000.
-
- Lewington K. Changes to medical education over the past 20 years. BMJ 2012;344.
-
- General Medical Council Tomorrow’s Doctors: Recommendations on Undergradaute Medical Education. London: General Medical Council, 2002.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources