Drug-induced anaphylaxis during general anesthesia in 14 tertiary hospitals in Japan: a retrospective, multicenter, observational study
- PMID: 33420820
- PMCID: PMC7840621
- DOI: 10.1007/s00540-020-02886-5
Drug-induced anaphylaxis during general anesthesia in 14 tertiary hospitals in Japan: a retrospective, multicenter, observational study
Abstract
Since perioperative anaphylaxis occurs suddenly, and it can be life-threatening, anesthesiologists need to have sufficient knowledge of the epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis and appropriate coping strategies to deal with it. Recent studies conducted in Western countries reported the characteristics of perioperative anaphylaxis in each country. However, there are few studies of perioperative anaphylaxis in Japan. To bridge the gap between Japan and other countries, the data of 46 anaphylaxis patients at Gunma University Hospital and 13 neighboring hospitals between 2012 and 2018 were collected and analyzed. The recently developed clinical scoring system was combined with a skin test to include only cases with a definite diagnosis. The most common causative agents were sugammadex, followed by rocuronium, cefazolin, and antibiotics other than cefazolin. Furthermore, the characteristics of anaphylaxis for each causative drug were identified. Time from drug administration to appearance of the first symptom was the longest in the cefazolin group. The incidence of canceled operation was the highest in the rocuronium group. Although it is unclear whether the results of this study can apply to Japan as a whole, the information about the agents responsible for perioperative anaphylaxis and the characteristics of anaphylaxis due to each agent would be helpful to anesthesiologists.
Keywords: Anaphylaxis; Antibiotics; Cefazolin; Rocuronium; Sugammadex.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Severe anaphylaxis after general anesthesia induction.J Anesth. 2021 Oct;35(5):771. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02962-4. Epub 2021 Jun 23. J Anesth. 2021. PMID: 34164750 No abstract available.
-
Reply to the letter.J Anesth. 2021 Oct;35(5):772. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02978-w. Epub 2021 Jul 28. J Anesth. 2021. PMID: 34319431 No abstract available.
References
-
- Mertes PM, Ebo DG, Garcez T, Rose M, Sabato V, Takazawa T, Cooke PJ, Clarke RC, Dewachter P, Garvey LH, Guttormsen AB, Hepner DL, Hopkins PM, Khan DA, Kolawole H, Kopac P, Kroigaard M, Laguna JJ, Marshall SD, Platt PR, Sadleir PHM, Savic LC, Savic S, Volcheck GW, Voltolini S. Comparative epidemiology of suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(1):e16–e28. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.027. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Harper NJN, Cook TM, Garcez T, Farmer L, Floss K, Marinho S, Torevell H, Warner A, Ferguson K, Hitchman J, Egner W, Kemp H, Thomas M, Lucas DN, Nasser S, Karanam S, Kong KL, Farooque S, Bellamy M, McGuire N. Anaesthesia, surgery, and life-threatening allergic reactions: epidemiology and clinical features of perioperative anaphylaxis in the 6th National Audit Project (NAP6) Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(1):159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.014. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
