Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun:70:67-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.12.004. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Nuclear envelope remodelling during mitosis

Affiliations
Review

Nuclear envelope remodelling during mitosis

Gautam Dey et al. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

The defining feature of the eukaryotic cell, the nucleus, is bounded by a double envelope. This envelope and the nuclear pores within it play a critical role in separating the genome from the cytoplasm. It also presents cells with a challenge. How are cells to remodel the nuclear compartment boundary during mitosis without compromising nuclear function? In the two billion years since the emergence of the first cells with a nucleus, eukaryotes have evolved a range of strategies to do this. At one extreme, the nucleus is disassembled upon entry into mitosis and then reassembled anew in the two daughter cells. At the other, cells maintain an intact nuclear compartment boundary throughout the division process. In this review, we discuss common features of the division process that underpin remodelling mechanisms, the topological challenges involved and speculate on the selective pressures that may drive the evolution of distinct modes of division.

Keywords: Eukaryogenesis; Lamina; Mitosis; Nuclear division; Nuclear envelope; Nuclear pore complex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement Nothing declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A schematic illustrating the full range of possible mitotic nuclear remodelling strategies, starting from completely open at the top to completely closed at the bottom. The compartment barrier is highlighted by labelling the nucleoplasm in blue and the cytoplasm in white; chromosomes are in dark grey and spindle microtubules in brown; other key cellular structures are labelled on the diagram. The two theoretical extremes have not been experimentally observed in any eukaryote to date. The blue bars indicate either local or global fenestration or ‘opening’ of the nuclear envelope, leading to a disruption of the barrier between the nucleoplasm and cytoplasm. In closed or semiclosed mitosis, the first local opening event allows the microtubule-nucleating centres to access the nucleoplasm; the second local opening drives nuclear division.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plasticity in nuclear remodelling across well-studied model systems. The compartment barrier is highlighted by labelling the nucleoplasm in blue and the cytoplasm in white; chromosomes are in dark grey and spindle microtubules in brown; other key cellular structures are labelled on the diagram. The presence (blue) or absence (grey) of homologues of an illustrative subset of the key protein or domain families involved in controlling nuclear remodelling is shown as a phylogenetic profile (filled circles) for each species. Differences in mitotic mode (closed or open) can be observed at large evolutionary distances, for example, between humans and fission yeast (illustrated by distance on the tree and low phylogenetic profile similarity), but also between closely related species, for example, S. pombe and S. japonicus (illustrated by proximity on the tree and high phylogenetic profile similarity). A divergence in lipin phosphorylation during mitosis [19] is thought to be responsible for the tearing of the nuclear envelope and loss of integrity in S. japonicus mitosis that is not observed during local NE breakdown [16,17] in its sister species S. pombe.

References

    1. De Magistris P., Antonin W. The dynamic nature of the nuclear envelope. Curr Biol. 2018;28:R487–R497. - PubMed
    2. Excellent recent review of nuclear envelope dynamics, focussing on how cells solve the various topological challenges of mitosis as well as NPC insertion and assembly by remodelling the nuclear envelope.

    1. Hampoelz B., Andres-Pons A., Kastritis P., Beck M. Structure and assembly of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biophys. 2019;48:515–536. - PubMed
    1. Romanauska A., Köhler A. The inner nuclear membrane is a metabolically active territory that generates nuclear lipid droplets. Cell. 2018;174:700–715. e18. - PMC - PubMed
    2. First demonstration of a unique metabolic activity traced to the inner nuclear envelope: enzymes directed to the inner nuclear envelope drive the synthesis of lipid droplets through lipid transfer regulated by Seipins.

    1. Bahmanyar S., Schlieker C. Lipid and protein dynamics that shape nuclear envelope identity. Mol Biol Cell. 2020;31:1315–1323. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Timely review of recent advances in understanding lipid and protein dynamics that distinguish the nuclear envelope from the rest of the endoplasmic reticulum.

    1. Smoyer C.J., Jaspersen S.L. Patrolling the nucleus: inner nuclear membrane-associated degradation. Curr Genet. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-00971-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    2. Specific proteasomal activity clears misfolded and mis-localised proteins from the inner nuclear envelope and maintains the integrity of the nuclear proteome. A recent review focussed mostly on findings in yeast.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources