Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 9;20(1):28.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01350-w.

Mapping experiences and perspectives of equity in international health collaborations: a scoping review

Marlyn C Faure  1 , Nchangwi S Munung  2 , Ntobeko A B Ntusi  3 , Bridget Pratt  4 , Jantina de Vries  3
Affiliations

Mapping experiences and perspectives of equity in international health collaborations: a scoping review

Marlyn C Faure et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: Whilst global health research often involves international collaborations, achieving or promoting equity within collaborations remains a key challenge, despite established conceptual approaches and the development of frameworks and guidelines to promote equity. There have also been several empirical studies documenting researchers' experiences of inequity and views on what is required to advance equity in global health collaborations. While these empirical studies provide critical insights, there has been no attempt to systematically synthetize what constitutes equity and how it can be achieved. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of qualitative studies, opinion and editorial pieces about what equity is and how it can be promoted in international collaborations.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review to explore domains of equity in international health collaborations. This review included qualitative studies and opinion pieces or editorial pieces on equity in international health collaborations. We mapped the data and identified common themes using a thematic analysis approach.

Results: This initial search retrieved a total of 7611 papers after removing duplicates. A total of 11 papers were included in this review, 10 empirical studies and 1 editorial piece. We conducted our search between October - November 2019. We identified 10 key domains which are important for promoting equity in international collaborations: funding; capacity building; authorship; sample ownership and export; trust; research agreement; acknowledging inequality; recognition and communication.

Discussion: Our findings suggest that for international collaborations to be considered more equitable, it must at least consider the 10 domains we highlighted. The 10 domains map onto five key aspects of social justice theory, namely avoiding unequal power relations like subordination, group recognition and affirmation, promoting the well-being of all, inclusion in decision-making and ensuring self-development.

Keywords: Equity; Global health; International health collaborations; Scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Strobe diagram showing flow of searches
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
10 key areas which critical for developing equitable international collaborations
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Parker M, Kingori P. Good and bad research collaborations: Researchers’ views on science and ethics in global health research. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0163579. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163579. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matenga TFL, Zulu JM, Corbin JH, Mweemba O. Contemporary issues in north-south health research partnerships: Perspectives of health research stakeholders in Zambia. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):7. 10.1186/s12961-018-0409-7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munung NS, Mayosi BM, De Vries J. Equity in international health research collaborations in Africa: Perceptions and expectations of African researchers. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186237. 10.1371/journal.pone.0186237. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godoy-Ruiz P, Cole DC, Lenters L, McKenzie K. Developing collaborative approaches to international research: perspectives of new global health researchers. Global Public Health. 2016;11(3):253–275. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.999814. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ward CL, Shaw D, Anane-Sarpong E, Sankoh O, Tanner M, Elger B. Defining health research for development: the perspective of stakeholders from an international health research partnership in Ghana and Tanzania. Dev World Bioethics. 2018;18(4):331–340. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12144. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types