Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 9;9(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00520-w.

Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations

Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic

Jessy Cattelan et al. J Intensive Care. .

Abstract

Background: During COVID-19 pandemic, visits have been prohibited in most French ICUs. Psychological effects, for reference persons (RPs), of remote-only communication have been assessed.

Methods: All RPs of patients referred to ICU for COVID-19 were included. HADS, IES-R, and satisfaction were evaluated at admission, discharge/death, and 3 months. At 3 months, a psychologist provided a qualitative description of RPs' psychological distress.

Results: Eighty-eight RPs were included. Prevalence of anxiety and depression was 83% and 73% respectively. At 3 months, lower HADS decrease was associated with patient death/continued hospitalization, and/or sleeping disorders in RPs (p < 0.01). Ninety-nine percent RPs felt the patient was safe (9 [7; 10]/10 points, Likert-type scale), confident with caregivers (10 [9; 10]/10 points), and satisfied with information provided (10 [9; 10]/10 points). All RPs stressed the specific-type of "responsibility" associated with being an RP in a remote-only context, leading RPs to develop narrow diffusion strategies (67%) and restrict the array of contacted relatives to a very few and/or only contacting them rarely. 10 RPs (30%) related the situation to a prior traumatic experience.

Conclusion: RPs experienced psychological distress and reported that being an RP in a remote-only communication context was a specific responsibility and qualified it as an overall negative experience.

Trial registration: NCT04385121 . Registered 12 May 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ .

Keywords: COVID-19; Reference person; Relative; Anxiety; Depression; Distress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Anxiety and depression symptoms in reference persons at ICU admission and discharge. a Prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms in reference persons (RPs) at ICU admission and discharge. b Evolution of total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) between ICU admission and discharge in the 88 RPs, represented by whisker boxes (horizontal line inside the box: median, upper, and lower boxes: limits 25–75th percentiles and T-bars: 10–90th percentiles, respectively). c Evolution of the HAD anxiety and depression subscales between ICU admission and discharge in the 88 RPs. Scores of 8 points or more in each subscale were used for definite cases (gray dashed line) of anxiety and/or depression. Whisker boxes (horizontal line inside the box: median, upper and lower boxes: limits 25–75th percentiles and T-bars: 10–90th percentiles, respectively)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sleep quality in reference persons at 3 months. Sleep quality was evaluated on a 10 points Likert-type scale at 3 months: 1 being a very bad quality of sleep and 10 a very good one
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Evaluation of reference persons’ feelings at 3 months. Feelings of (i) safety, (ii) confidence in intensive care unit (ICU) caregivers, therapeutic decisions and information, (iii) satisfaction toward ICU care and information modalities, and (iv) comprehension of diagnosis, therapeutic, and prognosis during ICU stay. These were evaluated on a 10 points Likert-type scale at 3 months: 1 being a very bad feeling of security/confidence/satisfaction/comprehension and 10 a very good one
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Anxiety and depression symptoms in reference persons at ICU admission, discharge and at 3 months. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) evolution between admission, discharge/death, and 3 months later, in 33 RPs, represented by whisker boxes (horizontal line inside the box: median, upper and lower boxes: limits 25–75th percentiles and T-bars: 10–90th percentiles, respectively)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Post-traumatic stress disorder in reference persons at 3 months. a Impact of Event Scale-revised (IES-R) represented by whisker boxes (horizontal line inside the box: median, upper, and lower boxes: limits 25–75th percentiles and T-bars: 10–90th percentiles, respectively). Scores exceeding 32 points (dashed line) on IES-R scale were considered as indicating a PTSD. b Prevalence of post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in reference persons (RPs) at 3 months

References

    1. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) - Coronvirus Ressource Center. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.
    1. Phua J, Weng L, Ling L, Egi M, Lim CM, Divatia JV, et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5):506–517. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davidson JE, Aslakson RA, Long AC, Puntillo KA, Kross EK, Hart J, et al. Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(1):103–128. - PubMed
    1. Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. New Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):469–478. - PubMed
    1. Davidson JE, Jones C, Bienvenu OJ. Family response to critical illness: postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):618–624. - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources