Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;6(1):100031.
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100031. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

The EMA assessment of encorafenib in combination with cetuximab for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma harbouring the BRAFV600E mutation who have received prior therapy

Affiliations
Review

The EMA assessment of encorafenib in combination with cetuximab for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma harbouring the BRAFV600E mutation who have received prior therapy

A Trullas et al. ESMO Open. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

On 2 June 2020, a marketing authorisation valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for encorafenib in combination with cetuximab in adult patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) with the BRAFV600E mutation who had received prior systemic therapy. Encorafenib plus cetuximab was evaluated in a randomised phase III trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib plus cetuximab versus encorafenib plus cetuximab versus cetuximab plus irinotecan or FOLFIRI (control arm) to adult patients with BRAFV600E mCRC who had received prior therapy for metastatic disease. The median overall survival was 9.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.05-11.30] versus 5.88 months (95% CI: 5.09-7.10) for encorafenib plus cetuximab (doublet) versus the control arm, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.77]. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.27 months (95% CI: 4.07-5.45) versus 1.54 months (95% CI: 1.48-1.91) (HR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.35-0.55). The most frequent adverse events in patients receiving encorafenib plus cetuximab were fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, acneiform dermatitis, abdominal pain, arthralgia, decreased appetite, vomiting and rash. The aim of this manuscript is to summarise the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU.

Keywords: BRAF; EMA; V600E; colorectal; encorafenib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Updated overall survival analysis of the doublet (cetuximab plus encorafenib) versus control arm (cetuximab plus irinotecan or FOLFIRI) (BEACON trial, cut-off date August 2019). CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival.

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J., Colombet M., Soerjomataram I. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer. 2018;103:356–387. - PubMed
    1. Van Cutsem E., Cervantes A., Nordlinger B., Arnold D. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(suppl 3):iii1–iii9. - PubMed
    1. Bradley C.J., Lansdorp-Vogelaar I., Yabroff K.R. Productivity savings from colorectal cancer prevention and control strategies. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41:e5–e14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franchi M., Barni S., Tagliabue G. Effectiveness of first-line bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: the observational cohort study GRETA. Oncologist. 2019;24:358–365. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms