A novel nomogram predicting lymph node invasion among patients with prostate cancer: The importance of extracapsular extension at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
- PMID: 33423938
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.11.040
A novel nomogram predicting lymph node invasion among patients with prostate cancer: The importance of extracapsular extension at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a novel risk tool that allows the prediction of lymph node invasion (LNI) among patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND).
Methods: We retrospectively identified 742 patients treated with RARP + ePLND at a single center between 2012 and 2018. All patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and were diagnosed with targeted biopsies. First, the nomogram published by Briganti et al. was validated in our cohort. Second, three novel multivariable logistic regression models predicting LNI were developed: (1) a complete model fitted with PSA, ISUP grade groups, percentage of positive cores (PCP), extracapsular extension (ECE), and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score; (2) a simplified model where ECE score was not included (model 1); and (3) a simplified model where PI-RADS score was not included (model 2). The predictive accuracy of the models was assessed with the receiver operating characteristic-derived area under the curve (AUC). Calibration plots and decision curve analyses were used.
Results: Overall, 149 patients (20%) had LNI. In multivariable logistic regression models, PSA (OR: 1.03; P= 0.001), ISUP grade groups (OR: 1.33; P= 0.001), PCP (OR: 1.01; P= 0.01), and ECE score (ECE 4 vs. 3 OR: 2.99; ECE 5 vs. 3 OR: 6.97; P< 0.001) were associated with higher rates of LNI. The AUC of the Briganti et al. model was 74%. Conversely, the AUC of model 1 vs. model 2 vs. complete model was, respectively, 78% vs. 81% vs. 81%. Simplified model 1 (ECE score only) was then chosen as the best performing model. A nomogram to calculate the individual probability of LNI, based on model 1 was created. Setting our cut-off at 5% we missed only 2.6% of LNI patients.
Conclusions: We developed a novel nomogram that combines PSA, ISUP grade groups, PCP, and mpMRI-derived ECE score to predict the probability of LNI at final pathology in RARP candidates. The application of a nomogram derived cut-off of 5% allows to avoid a consistent number of ePLND procedures, missing only 2.6% of LNI patients. External validation of our model is needed.
Keywords: LNI; Lymph nodes dissection; Multiparametric MRI; Nomogram; Prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies.Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):506-514. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 17. Eur Urol. 2019. PMID: 30342844
-
Identification of the Optimal Candidates for Nodal Staging with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Prostate Cancer Patients Who Underwent Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography. External Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Briganti Nomograms and Development of a Novel Tool.Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Dec;6(6):543-552. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 Jun 1. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37270378
-
External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.Urol Int. 2013;90(3):277-82. doi: 10.1159/000343993. Epub 2012 Dec 22. Urol Int. 2013. PMID: 23296120
-
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2):B5327. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28157066 Review.
-
Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detecting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Radiol. 2019 Dec;92(1104):20190480. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190480. Epub 2019 Oct 16. Br J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31596123 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
MRI-based nomograms and radiomics in presurgical prediction of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Jul;48(7):2379-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03924-y. Epub 2023 May 4. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023. PMID: 37142824
-
Novel, alternative splicing signature to detect lymph node metastasis in prostate adenocarcinoma with machine learning.Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 13;12:1084403. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1084403. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36713568 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer using the Likert scale combined with clinical and pathological parameters.Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 8;13:1229552. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1229552. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37614509 Free PMC article.
-
The survival benefit of different lymph node yields in radical prostatectomy for pN1M0 prostate cancer patients: Implications from a population-based study.Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;12:953069. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.953069. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36033541 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of Machine Learning Models to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis of Japanese Localized Prostate Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;16(23):4073. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234073. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39682259 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous