Dietary intake of artificial food color additives containing food products by school-going children
- PMID: 33424279
- PMCID: PMC7783677
- DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.025
Dietary intake of artificial food color additives containing food products by school-going children
Abstract
Nutritional risk in children is associated with food safety. This is the first study to identify the food type consumed by 6-17-year-old school-going children in Saudi Arabia. Eight permitted artificial food color additives, including Tartrazine (E102), Sunset Yellow (E110), Carmoisine (E122), Allura Red (E129), Indigo Carmine (E132), Brilliant Blue (E133), Fast Green (E143), and Black PN (E151), and two non-permitted ones, Erythrosine (E127) and Red 2G (E128), were determined using 24-h dietary recall questionnaires. Artificial color additives in 839 food products were divided into nine categories, including biscuits, cakes, chocolates, chips, ice cream, juices and drinks, candy, jelly, and chewing gum, are determined using high performance liquid chromatography and diode array detector. The results indicated a high intake of juices and drinks, ice cream, and cakes, but low consumption of chewing gum among school-going children. Among the permitted artificial food color additives, Brilliant Blue (E133) (54.1%) and Tartrazine (E102) (42.3%) were the most commonly used. Sunset Yellow (E110) in one chocolate sample, Tartrazine (E102) and Sunset Yellow (E110) in one and two juice and drink samples, respectively, and Brilliant Blue (E133) in two candy samples exceeded the permitted level. Therefore, further investigations are needed to provide insights into the possible adverse health effects of high intake of these additives in artificial food coloring on the test population are warranted.
Keywords: Artificial food color additives; Dietary intake; Food products; School-going children; Sunset Yellow; Tartrazine.
© 2020 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures




References
-
- Arnold L.E., Lofthouse N., Hurt E. Artificial food colors and attention-deficit/hyperactivity symptoms: conclusions to dye for. Neurotherapeutics. 2012;9(3):599–609. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441937/pdf/13311_2012_Arti... - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bateman B., Warner J.O., Hutchinson E., Dean T., Rowlandson P., Gant C., Grundy J., Fitzgerald C., Stevenson J. The effects of a double blind, placebo controlled artificial food colourings and benzoate preservative challenge on hyperactivity in a general population sample of preschool children. Arch. Dis. Child. 2004;89:506–511. https://adc.bmj.com/content/89/6/506.short - PMC - PubMed
-
- Boekelheide K., Brent R., Charnley G., Cheung V.G., Jr S.G. Toxicity testing in the 21st Century: A vision and a strategy. J Toxicol Env. Heal. B Crit Rev. 2010;13:51–138. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410863/pdf/nihms245994.pdf - PMC - PubMed
-
- Das A., Mukherjee A. Genotoxicity testing of the food colours amaranth and tartrazine. Int. J. Hum. Genet. 2004;4:277–280. doi: 10.31901/24566330.2004/04.04.09. - DOI
-
- Del Giovine L., Bocca A.P. Determination of synthetic dyes in ice-cream by capillary electrophoresis. Food Control. 2003;14:131–135. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(02)00055-5. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources