Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 23:11:566728.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566728. eCollection 2020.

Character Strengths Profiles in Medical Professionals and Their Impact on Well-Being

Affiliations

Character Strengths Profiles in Medical Professionals and Their Impact on Well-Being

Alexandra Huber et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Character strengths profiles in the specific setting of medical professionals are widely unchartered territory. This paper focused on an overview of character strengths profiles of medical professionals (medical students and physicians) based on literature research and available empirical data illustrating their impact on well-being and work engagement. A literature research was conducted and the majority of peer-reviewed considered articles dealt with theoretical or conceptually driven 'virtues' associated with medical specialties or questions of ethics in patient care (e.g., professionalism, or what makes a good physician). The virtues of compassion, courage, altruism, and benevolence were described most often. Only a limited number of papers addressed character strengths of medical students or physicians according to the VIA-classification. Those articles showed that the VIA-character strengths fairness, honesty, kindness, and teamwork were considered most often by respondents to be particularly important for the medical profession. Available cross-sectional (time span: six years) and longitudinal (time span: three years) data regarding VIA-character strengths profiles of medical professionals were analyzed (N = 584 medical students, 274 physicians). These profiles were quite homogenous among both groups. The character strengths fairness, honesty, judgment, kindness, and love had the highest means in both samples. Noteworthy differences appeared when comparing medical specialties, in particular concerning general surgeons and psychiatrists, with the former reporting clearly higher levels of e.g., honesty (d = 1.02) or prudence (d = 1.19). Long-term results revealed significant positive effects of character strengths on well-being and work engagement (e.g., perseverance on physicians' work engagement) but also significant negative effects (e.g., appreciation of beauty and excellence on students' well-being). Further, hope was significantly associated both positively with physicians' well-being and negatively with students' work engagement, possibly indicating specific issues concerning medical education or hospital working conditions. According to the modern-day physician's pledge, medical professionals should pay attention to their own well-being and health. Therefore, promoting self-awareness and character building among medical professionals could be a beneficial strategy.

Keywords: VIA-classification; character strengths profiles; medical students; physicians; well-being; work engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Comparison of VIA-character strengths between medical students and physicians.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Comparison of VIA-character strengths between male and female medical students. Note. Character strengths marked with an asterisk are significantly different between groups.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Medical students’ VIA-character strengths profile according to the preferred specialty. Note. Character strengths marked with an asterisk are significantly different between groups.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Comparison of VIA-character strengths between male and female physicians. Note. Character strengths marked with an asterisk are significantly different between groups.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Comparison of VIA-character strengths between physicians in training and medical specialists. Note. Character strengths marked with an asterisk are significantly different between groups.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Comparison of VIA-character strengths between physicians of different specialties. Note. Character strengths marked with an asterisk are significantly different between groups.

References

    1. Allan B. A., Owens R. L., Douglass R. P. (2019). Character Strengths in Counselors: Relations With Meaningful Work and Burnout. J. Career Assess. 27 151–166. 10.1177/1069072717748666 - DOI
    1. Angelos. (2017). The right choice? Surgeons, confidence, and humility. Available online at: https://www.mdedge.com/surgery/article/130301/practice-management/right-... (accessed February 17, 2017)
    1. Angerer P., Weigl M. (2015). Physicians’ Psychosocial Work Conditions and Quality of Care: A Literature Review. Profess. Professional. 5:960 10.7577/pp.960 - DOI
    1. Aramesh K. (2017). Compassion as the reunion of feminine and masculine virtues in medicine. J. Med. Ethics His. Med. 10 1–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bain L. E. (2018). Revisiting the need for virtue in medical practice: a reflection upon the teaching of Edmund Pellegrino. Philos. Ethics Humanit. Med. 13 1–5. 10.1186/s13010-018-0057-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources