Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Dec 23:11:541699.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.541699. eCollection 2020.

The Body Weight Alteration and Incidence of Neoplasm in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The Body Weight Alteration and Incidence of Neoplasm in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Chu Lin et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objective: Whether hypoglycemic treatments with weight-alternating effects influence the incidence of neoplasm in type 2 diasbetes (T2D) remains uncertain. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between the weight alteration and incidence of neoplasm in patients with T2D.

Research design and methods: Systematic searches were conducted for studies published between the inception of 1950s and September 2019. Randomized controlled trials conducted in T2D patients with at least 48-week follow-up, significant weight change difference between treatment arms and reports of neoplasm events were included. Fixed-effects model and meta-regression analysis were accordingly used.

Results: In all, 46 studies were included. Analysis indicated weight reduction was not associated with a decreased incidence of neoplasm (OR = 1.01, 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.07, I2 = 17%) and weight elevation was not associated with an increased incidence of neoplasm (OR = 0.91, 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.09, I2 = 0%). Meta-regression analysis showed a slower weight reduction rate (β = -5.983, 95% CI, -11.412 to 0.553, P = 0.03) instead of weight change difference (β = -0.030, 95% CI, -0.068 to 0.007, P = 0.115) was significantly associated with reduced risk of neoplasm in patients with T2D. Moreover, a decreased incidence of prostate, bladder, and uterine neoplasm was observed in T2D patients with weight reduction difference while an increased incidence of thyroid neoplasm was found in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analog (GLP-1RA) users with weight reduction difference.

Conclusions: Additional weight change achieved by current hypoglycemic agents or strategies in short and medium periods was not associated with incidence of most neoplasm in patients with T2D. However, a decreased incidence of prostate, bladder, and uterine neoplasm was shown in T2D patients with weight reduction difference while an increased risk of thyroid neoplasm was observed in T2D patients on GLP-1RA treatments with weight reduction difference. A more sustained and persistent weight reduction process may confer reduced risk of neoplasm in patients with T2D.

Keywords: body-weight trajectory; cancer; hypoglycemic agents; neoplasms; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LJ has received fees for lecture presentations and for consulting from AstraZeneca, Merck, Metabasis, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Weight alteration and incidence of neoplasm in randomized clinical trials of patients with type 2 diabetes. (A) Randomized controlled trials with weight reduction difference. CANA, canagliflozin; DAPA, dapagliflozin; EMPA, empagliflozin; ERTU, ertugliflozin; SAXA, saxagliptin; SITA, sitagliptin; GLP-1RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; ALBI, albiglutide; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors; MET, metformin; PIO, pioglitazone; PBO, placebo; CANVAS, Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes; CANVAS-R, CANVAS-Renal; CREDENCE, Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy; DECLARE-TIMI 58, The Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; CAROLINA, Cardiovascular Outcome Study of Linagliptin versus Glimepiride in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes; EMPA-REG, Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes; HARMONY, Albiglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease; REWIND, Dulaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes; LEADER: Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes; SUSTAIN6, Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes; ELIXA, Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome; DUAL VIII, Durability of insulin degludec plus liraglutide versus insulin glargine U100 as initial injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes. (B) Randomized controlled trials with weight elevation difference. SU, sulfonylurea; TZD, thiazolidinedione; VADT, Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial; ACCORD, The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes; UKPDS, The UK Prospective Diabetes Study; RECORD, Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Meta-regression analysis of weight change difference and change rate with incidence of neoplasm in patients with type 2 diabetes. (A) Weight change difference and incidence of neoplasm (β = −0.030, 95% CI, −0.068 to 0.007, P = 0.115). (B) Weight change rate and incidence of neoplasm (β = −5.983, 95% CI, −11.412 to 0.553, P = 0.031).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The association between weight reduction difference or change rate and the incidence of uterine neoplasm. (A) Weight reduction difference and incidence of uterine neoplasm (β = 0.8743, 95% CI, 0.2206 to 1.5280, P = 0.012). (B) Weight reduction rate and incidence of uterine neoplasm (β = 34.062, 95% CI, −6.3617 to 74.4857, P = 0.094).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giovannucci E, Harlan DM, Archer MC, Bergenstal RM, Gapstur SM, Habel LA, et al. Diabetes and Cancer: A Consensus Report. CA Cancer J Clin (2010) 60:207–21. 10.3322/caac.20078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsson SC, Nicola O, Alicja W. Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 97:1679–87. 10.1093/jnci/dji375 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsson SC, Orsini N, Brismar K, Wolk A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. Diabetologia (2006) 49:2819–23. 10.1007/s00125-006-0468-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mats L, Annette W, Hans G, Walldius G, Jungner I, Hammar N. Impaired glucose metabolism and diabetes and the risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer. Cancer Causes Control (2011) 22:1163–71. 10.1007/s10552-011-9794-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Y, Wu F, Saito E, Lin Y, Song M, Luu HN, et al. Association between type 2 diabetes and risk of cancer mortality: a pooled analysis of over 771,000 individuals in the Asia Cohort Consortium. Diabetologia (2017) 60:1022–32. 10.1007/s00125-017-4229-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances