Collection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus from the Air of a Clinic Within a University Student Health Care Center and Analyses of the Viral Genomic Sequence
- PMID: 33424954
- PMCID: PMC7792982
- DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2020.02.0202
Collection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus from the Air of a Clinic Within a University Student Health Care Center and Analyses of the Viral Genomic Sequence
Abstract
The progression of COVID-19 worldwide can be tracked by identifying mutations within the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 that occur as a function of time. Such efforts currently rely on sequencing the genome of SARS-CoV-2 in patient specimens (direct sequencing) or of virus isolated from patient specimens in cell cultures. A pilot SARS-CoV-2 air sampling study conducted at a clinic within a university student health care center detected the virus vRNA, with an estimated concentration of 0.87 virus genomes L-1 air. To determine whether the virus detected was viable ('live'), attempts were made to isolate the virus in cell cultures. Virus-induced cytopathic effects (CPE) were observed within two days post-inoculation of Vero E6 cells with collection media from air samples; however, rtRT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 vRNA from cell culture were negative. Instead, three other fast-growing human respiratory viruses were isolated and subsequently identified, illustrating the challenge in isolating SARS-CoV-2 when multiple viruses are present in a test sample. The complete SAR-CoV-2 genomic sequence was nevertheless determined by Sanger sequencing and most closely resembles SARS-CoV-2 genomes previously described in Georgia, USA. Results of this study illustrate the feasibility of tracking progression of the COVID-19 pandemic using environmental aerosol samples instead of human specimens. Collection of a positive sample from a distance more than 2 m away from the nearest patient traffic implies the virus was in an aerosol.
Keywords: COVID-19; aerosol; air sampling.
Figures



Similar articles
-
SARS-CoV-2 in residential rooms of two self-isolating persons with COVID-19.J Aerosol Sci. 2022 Jan;159:105870. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105870. Epub 2021 Aug 28. J Aerosol Sci. 2022. PMID: 34483358 Free PMC article.
-
Shedding of Viable Virus in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Carriers.mSphere. 2021 May 19;6(3):e00019-21. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00019-21. mSphere. 2021. PMID: 34011679 Free PMC article.
-
Lack of viable severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among PCR-positive air samples from hospital rooms and community isolation facilities.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;42(11):1327-1332. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.8. Epub 2021 Jan 25. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 33487210 Free PMC article.
-
Viral cultures for assessing fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Hosp Infect. 2022 Dec;130:63-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 14. J Hosp Infect. 2022. PMID: 36115620 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Air Contamination by SARS-CoV-2 in Hospital Settings.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2033232. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33232. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33355679 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens are detected in continuous air samples from congregate settings.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Mar 30:2022.03.29.22272716. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.29.22272716. medRxiv. 2022. Update in: Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 11;13(1):4717. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32406-w. PMID: 35378751 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Environmental Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 in Two Restaurants from a Mid-scale City that Followed U.S. CDC Reopening Guidance.Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2022 Jan;22(1):210304. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.210304. Epub 2021 Dec 3. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2022. PMID: 35024044 Free PMC article.
-
Phylogenetic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Data Is Difficult.Mol Biol Evol. 2021 May 4;38(5):1777-1791. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa314. Mol Biol Evol. 2021. PMID: 33316067 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 air sampling: A systematic review on the methodologies for detection and infectivity.Indoor Air. 2022 Aug;32(8):e13083. doi: 10.1111/ina.13083. Indoor Air. 2022. PMID: 36040285 Free PMC article.
-
Why airborne transmission hasn't been conclusive in case of COVID-19? An atmospheric science perspective.Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 15;773:145525. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145525. Epub 2021 Feb 1. Sci Total Environ. 2021. PMID: 33940729 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Chia PY, Coleman KK, Tan YK, Ong SWX, Gum M, Lau SK, Sutjipto S, Lee PH, Son TT, Young BE, Milton DK, Gray GC, Schuster S, Barkham T, De PP, Vasoo S, Chan M, Ang BSP, Tan BH, Leo YS, Ng O-T, Wong MSY and Marimuthu K (2020). Detection of Air and Surface Contamination by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Hospital Rooms of Infected Patients. medRxiv: 2020.2003.2029.20046557. - PubMed
-
- Hadei M, Hopke PK, Jonidi A and Shahsavani A (2020). A Letter About the Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Based on the Current Evidence. Aerosol Air Qual. Res 20: 911–914.
-
- Hogan CJJ, Kettleson EM, Lee MH, Ramaswami B, Angenent LT and Biswas P (2005). Sampling Methodologies and Dosage Assessment Techniques for Submicrometer and Ultrafine Virus Aerosol Particles. J. Appl. Microb 99: 1422–1434. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous