Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in the Greek population is high and impacts on the interpretation of the risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score
- PMID: 33425013
- PMCID: PMC7758802
- DOI: 10.1177/1756286420964673
Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in the Greek population is high and impacts on the interpretation of the risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score
Abstract
Background: The risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score calculates the probability that patent foramen ovale (PFO) is causally related to stroke (PFO attributable fraction, PFOAF), based on PFO prevalence in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) compared with that in the general population. The latter has been estimated at 25%; however, PFO prevalence in nonselected populations varies widely.
Methods: Since PFO prevalence in Greece remains unknown, we evaluated it and we calculated PFOAF stratified by RoPE score in a cohort of patients with CS ⩽55 years old. PFO was detected according to the international consensus transcranial Doppler (TCD) criteria in 124 healthy subjects (H), in 102 patients with CS, and in 56 patients with stroke of known cause (nonCS). Each subject underwent unilateral middle cerebral artery recording after infusion of agitated saline, at rest, and after a controlled Valsalva maneuver. We characterized PFO as large (>20 microbubbles or curtain), moderate (11-20), and small (⩽10).
Results: PFO was detected in 42.7% of H, 49% of CS, and 25% of nonCS (p = 0.013). Large PFOs were numerically higher in CS [28.4% (29/102)] compared with H [19.3% (24/124); p = 0.1] and to nonCS [7.1% (4/56), p = 0.04]. The median RoPE score in patients with CS and PFO was seven. Even patients with very high RoPE score (9-10) had moderate PFOAF (57%). For any individual stratum up to RopE score 8, PFOAF was <33%.
Conclusions: PFO prevalence in the Greek population is much higher than the widely accepted 25%. PFO may be the cause of stroke in one out of nine Greek patients with CS. Among Greek CS patients who harbor a PFO, the latter is causal in one out of five. The established RoPE score cutoff of ⩾7 for having a probable PFO-associated stroke may overestimate the probability in patients deriving from populations with high PFO prevalence.
Keywords: PFO-associated stroke; RopE score; cryptogenic stroke; patent foramen ovale; right-to-left cardiac shunt; transcranial Doppler.
© The Author(s), 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Saver JL. Cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 2065–2074. - PubMed
-
- Hara H, Virmani R, Ladich E, et al. Patent foramen ovale: current pathology, pathophysiology, and clinical status. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1768–1776. - PubMed
-
- Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos AH, Mavridis D, et al. Percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for secondary stroke prevention: network meta-analysis. Neurology 2018; 91: e8–e18. - PubMed
-
- Mojadidi MK, Elgendy AY, Elgendy IY, et al. Transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure after cryptogenic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10: 2228–2230. - PubMed
-
- Palaiodimos L, Kokkinidis DG, Faillace RT, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale vs. medical treatment for patients with history of cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2018; 19: 852–858. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
