Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;10(2):021005.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.021005. Epub 2020 Dec 19.

Impact of mHealth interventions for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition at scale: BBC Media Action and the Ananya program in Bihar, India

Collaborators, Affiliations

Impact of mHealth interventions for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition at scale: BBC Media Action and the Ananya program in Bihar, India

Victoria C Ward et al. J Glob Health. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) tools have potential for improving the reach and quality of health information and services through community health workers in low- and middle-income countries. This study evaluates the impact of an mHealth tool implemented at scale as part of the statewide reproductive,maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition (RMNCHN) program in Bihar, India.

Methods: Three survey-based data sets were analysed to compare the health-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviours amongst childbearing women exposed to the Mobile Kunji and Dr. Anita mHealth tools during their visits with frontline workers compared with those who were unexposed.

Results: An evaluation by Mathematica (2014) revealed that exposure to Mobile Kunji and Dr. Anita recordings were associated with significantly higher odds of consuming iron-folic acid tablets (odds ratio (OR) = 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.8-3.1) as well as taking a set of three measures for delivery preparedness (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.9-4.2) and appropriate infant complementary feeding (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.0-3.5). CARE India's Community-based Household Surveys (2012-2017) demonstrated significant improvements in early breastfeeding (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.5-1.78) and exclusive breastfeeding (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.33-1.62) in addition to birth preparedness practices. BBC Media Action's Usage & Engagement Survey (2014) demonstrated a positive association between exposure to Mobile Kunji and Dr. Anita and exclusive breastfeeding (58% exposed vs 43% unexposed, P < 0.01) as well as maternal respondents' trust in their frontline worker.

Conclusions: Significant improvements in RMNCHN-related knowledge and behaviours were observed for Bihari women who were exposed to Mobile Kunji and Dr. Anita. This analysis is unique in its rigorous evaluation across multiple data sets of mHealth interventions implemented at scale. These results can help inform global understanding of how best to use mHealth tools, for whom, and in what contexts.

Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02726230.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors have completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare no other competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Exposure to Mobile Kunji and Dr. Anita in eight focus districts and thirty non-focus districts, Community-based Household Surveys, Bihar, India, 2012-2017.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition behaviours for maternal household respondents in eight focus districts who were exposed to Mobile Kunji vs those who were unexposed across rounds 2-9 of the Community-based Household Surveys, Bihar, India, 2012-2017.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang H, Liddell CA, Coates MM, Mooney MD, Levitz CE, Schumacher AE, et al. Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:957-79. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60497-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. You D, Hug L, Ejdemyr S, Idele P, Hogan D, Mathers C, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Lancet. 2015;386:2275-86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00120-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, Axelson H, Berman P, Boerma T, Bryce J, et al. Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000-10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet. 2010;375:2032-44. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60678-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L, et al. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet. 2005;365:977-88. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71088-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chopra M, Sharkey A, Dalmiya N, Anthony D, Binkin N.Strategies to improve health coverage and narrow the equity gap in child survival, health, and nutrition. Lancet. 2012;380:1331-40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61423-8 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data