Assessment of Macular Function Following Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling With ILM Blue®

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate clinical outcome after surgery of idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERM) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling using a commercial combination of Brilliant blue G (BBG, 0.25 mg/ml) with 4% polyethylene glycol (PEG). Methods It was a prospective, single-center study. Macular surgery was performed due to ERM (n = 18) by two experienced surgeons. Exclusion criteria were secondary ERM, previous retinal surgery and pharmacological treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and multifocal ERG (RETIscan) were assessed at baseline and three months after surgery. Results The BCVA improved from baseline 0.4 ± 0.13 logMAR to 0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR after three months (p > 0.05). The mean central foveal thickness was reduced from 407 ± 85 μm to 366 ± 56 μm after three months (p > 0.05). At baseline, the mean P1 amplitude (nV/deg²) was 53.5 ± 32.1 in ring 1 and 35.9 ± 20.1 in ring 2. Three months after surgery the mean P1 amplitude was comparable with 57.2 ± 16.3 in ring 1 and 38.0 ± 11.7 in ring 2 compared with the initial situation (p = 0.22 and p = 0.3, respectively). Conclusion BBG with 4% PEG can be used for ILM peeling in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes without any sign of short-term toxicity.

Keywords: brilliant blue g; epiretinal membrane; ilm blue; ilm peeling.

Figure 1. Intraoperative steps of ILM peeling with ILM Blue. A) ILM Blue, which sediments at the posterior pole. B) Staining of ILM Blue unevenly due to the presence of the epiretinal membrane. C) Maculorrhexis: ILM flap grasped with an end gripping forceps.

ILM: Internal limiting membrane