Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 20:13:2631774520979591.
doi: 10.1177/2631774520979591. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

The evolution of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: where are we now?

Arun Sivananthan  1 , Ben Glover  2 , Lakshmana Ayaru  3 , Kinesh Patel  4 , Ara Darzi  2 , Nisha Patel  2
Affiliations
Review

The evolution of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: where are we now?

Arun Sivananthan et al. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. .

Abstract

Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy has evolved over time, fulfilling a widening diagnostic and therapeutic remit. As our understanding of colorectal cancer and its prevention has improved, endoscopy has progressed with improved diagnostic technologies and advancing endoscopic therapies. Despite this, the fundamental design of the endoscope has remained similar since its inception. This review presents the important role lower gastrointestinal endoscopy serves in the prevention of colorectal cancer and the desirable characteristics of the endoscope that would enhance this. A brief history of the endoscope is presented. Current and future robotic endoscopic platforms, which may fulfil these desirable characteristics, are discussed. The incorporation of new technologies from allied scientific disciplines will help the endoscope fulfil its maximum potential in preventing the increasing global burden of colorectal cancer. There are a number of endoscopic platforms under development, which show significant promise.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; disposable endoscopes; endoscopic mucosal resection; endoscopic submucosal dissection; robotic endoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Evolution of the endoscope: (a) Lichtleiter endoscope (1806), (b) Mikulicz gastroscope (1881), (c) Schindler’s gastroscope (1932) and (d) Hirschowitz fibrescope (1957).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
EndoRings (left) and ENDOCUFF VISION.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Power Spiral (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Aer-O-Scope. Images show whole setup, insertion portion and close up view of tip with demonstration of vieiwing angles below. (GI View Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Endotics (Era Endoscopy, Peccioli, Italy).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Invendoscope (Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Endoluminal Assistant for Surgical Endoscopy (EASE). a) slave component; b) master component (ICube laboratory, Strasbourg, France).
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
I²Snake (Hamlyn Centre, London, UK).
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Master (EndoMASTER Pte, Singapore).
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Flex Colorectal Drive (Medrobotics Corp, Raynam, Massachusetts, USA).
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
CYCLOPS (Hamlyn Centre, London, UK).
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
Eye Gaze: robotised system (left) and simulated trial (right).
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
Meshworm.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Health Organization and International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer Today Globocan 2018, http://gco.iarc.fr/today/fact-sheets-cancers (accessed 20 October 2019)
    1. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 2017; 66: 683–691. - PubMed
    1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687–696. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1298–1306. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, et al. Reduced risk of colorectal cancer up to 10 years after screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 709–717. - PubMed