Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;24(1):1-52.
doi: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1840762. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues

Tommie Forslund  1   2 Pehr Granqvist  1 Marinus H van IJzendoorn  3 Avi Sagi-Schwartz  4 Danya Glaser  5   6 Miriam Steele  7 Mårten Hammarlund  1 Carlo Schuengel  8 Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg  8 Howard Steele  7 Phillip R Shaver  9 Ulrike Lux  10 John Simmonds  11 Deborah Jacobvitz  12 Ashley M Groh  13 Kristin Bernard  14 Chantal Cyr  15 Nancy L Hazen  12 Sarah Foster  16 Elia Psouni  17 Philip A Cowan  18 Carolyn Pape Cowan  18 Anne Rifkin-Graboi  19 David Wilkins  20 Blaise Pierrehumbert  21 George M Tarabulsy  22 Rodrigo A Carcamo  23 Zhengyan Wang  24 Xi Liang  24 Maria Kázmierczak  25 Paulina Pawlicka  25 Lilian Ayiro  26 Tamara Chansa  27 Francis Sichimba  27 Haatembo Mooya  27 Loyola McLean  28 Manuela Verissimo  29 Sonia Gojman-de-Millán  30 Marlene M Moretti  31 Fabien Bacro  32 Mikko J Peltola  33 Megan Galbally  34   35   36 Kiyomi Kondo-Ikemura  37 Kazuko Y Behrens  38 Stephen Scott  39 Andrés Fresno Rodriguez  40 Rosario Spencer  40 Germán Posada  41 Rosalinda Cassibba  42 Neus Barrantes-Vidal  43   44   45 Jesus Palacios  46 Lavinia Barone  47 Sheri Madigan  48   49 Karen Jones-Mason  50 Sophie Reijman  51 Femmie Juffer  52 R Pasco Fearon  53 Annie Bernier  54 Dante Cicchetti  55 Glenn I Roisman  56 Jude Cassidy  57 Heinz Kindler  58 Peter Zimmermann  59 Ruth Feldman  60 Gottfried Spangler  61 Charles H Zeanah  62 Mary Dozier  63 Jay Belsky  64 Michael E Lamb  65 Robbie Duschinsky  66
Affiliations
Free article

Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues

Tommie Forslund et al. Attach Hum Dev. 2022 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilisation of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. The article is divided into two parts. In the first, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child's need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behaviour to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behaviour should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration.

Keywords: Attachment theory; best interests of the child; child custody; child protection; consensus statement; family court.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources