Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;45(3):575-583.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04910-5. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Short stem total hip arthroplasty with the direct anterior approach demonstrates suboptimal fixation

Affiliations

Short stem total hip arthroplasty with the direct anterior approach demonstrates suboptimal fixation

Guido Garavaglia et al. Int Orthop. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Short stems use has increased substantially despite variable results reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the rate of complications using a short stem implanted through the direct anterior approach (DAA), and to evaluate mid-term clinical and radiological results focusing on femoral stem fixation.

Methods: Between April 2009 and November 2014, 698 elective total hip arthroplasties (THAs) were performed using a fully hydroxyapatite-coated short stem (AMIStem-H®). The mean age was 65.7 years (SD 12.6). Patients were invited for clinical and radiological evaluation, and to complete patient-reported outcomes questionnaires at two and five years after surgery. The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (range 2-9.73 years).

Results: During the study period, 59 (8.5%) patients died and 24 (3.4%) were lost to follow-up. There were six (0.9%) dislocations and 12 (1.7%) fractures, seven occurred intra-operatively. Twenty-nine (4.2%) THAs required revision surgery. Eleven THAs were revised for aseptic loosening of the stem at a mean 4.9 years (1.2-7.3 years). Five years after surgery, radiographs of 324 THAs (324/425 eligible = 76.2%) were available. Stem subsidence ≥ 2 mm was present in 42 cases (12.9%), proximal radiolucencies in 101 hips (31.5%), cortical thickening in 52 (16.0%), and a pedestal in 219 (67.6%). An Engh score between - 10 and 0 was associated with lower HHS pain subscore (p = 0.005), a higher risk of stem revision for aseptic loosening (18.8% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.008), and was more frequent in younger patients with ASA score 1.

Conclusion: Patients presenting radiological alterations at five years had an increased risk of revision for aseptic stem loosening and also inferior clinical results. Our study warrants further continued scrutiny of mid- and long-term survivorship of the AMIStem-H®, with radiological results at five years indicating suboptimal fixation of the stem in younger and active patients.

Keywords: Complications; Loosening; Short stem; Total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier failure function of Versafit cup/AMIS stem uncemented
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of detected radiological signs at 5-year FU
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Illustrative case of aseptic loosening of the femoral stem of a 57-year-old patient who had a total hip replacement on his left hip. Radiological features of progressive loosening and mobilization of the femoral stem at two and five year follow-up. Joint aspiration was negative for bacteria as well as deep tissue cultures obtained from intra-operative samples. The hip was subsequently revised with a cemented femoral stem
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Harris Hip Subscore pain according to Engh score category. Engh score dichotomized > 0 and ≤ 0: < − 10 “unstable” and – 10–0 = “suboptimum but stable” vs. 0–10 = “ingrowth suspected” and > 10 = “bone ingrowth”; Harris Hip Score: 0–44 = no pain. When comparing HHS pain in Engh > 0 and ≤ 0, there were proportionally more patients having a low HHS pain in the ≤ 0 group. p = 0.037 chi-square linear by linear

Comment in

References

    1. Falez F, Casella F, Papalia M. Current concepts, classification, and results in short stem hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2015;38(3 Suppl):S6–S13. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150215-50. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lidder S, Epstein DJ, Scott G. A systematic review of short metaphyseal loading cementless stems in hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-b(5):502–511. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.101b5.Bjj-2018-1199.R1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feyen H, Shimmin AJ. Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement? Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(4):442–448. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khanuja HS, Banerjee S, Jain D, Pivec R, Mont MA. Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(20):1742–1752. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00780. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rolfson O, Karrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011;93(7):867–875. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.93b7.25737. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types