Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec;24(4):367-382.
doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00557-5. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Methods for the segmentation and classification of breast ultrasound images: a review

Affiliations
Review

Methods for the segmentation and classification of breast ultrasound images: a review

Ademola E Ilesanmi et al. J Ultrasound. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Breast ultrasound (BUS) is one of the imaging modalities for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. However, the segmentation and classification of BUS images is a challenging task. In recent years, several methods for segmenting and classifying BUS images have been studied. These methods use BUS datasets for evaluation. In addition, semantic segmentation algorithms have gained prominence for segmenting medical images.

Methods: In this paper, we examined different methods for segmenting and classifying BUS images. Popular datasets used to evaluate BUS images and semantic segmentation algorithms were examined. Several segmentation and classification papers were selected for analysis and review. Both conventional and semantic methods for BUS segmentation were reviewed.

Results: Commonly used methods for BUS segmentation were depicted in a graphical representation, while other conventional methods for segmentation were equally elucidated.

Conclusions: We presented a review of the segmentation and classification methods for tumours detected in BUS images. This review paper selected old and recent studies on segmenting and classifying tumours in BUS images.

Keywords: Benign tumour; Breast tumour segmentation and classification; Breast ultrasound (BUS); Malignant tumour; Segmentation performance analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
BUS segmentation approaches
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
BUS classification methods
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Datasets for BUS segmentation and classification methods
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Research article by publishers
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Number of papers published yearly
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Analyses of segmentation methods
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Analyses of classification methods

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smistad E, Falch TL, Bozorgi M, Elster AC, Lindseth F. Medical image segmentation on GPUs—a comprehensive review. Med Image Anal. 2015;20(1):1–18. - PubMed
    1. Wang Z, Cui Z, Zhu Y. Multi-modal medical image fusion by Laplacian pyramid and adaptive sparse representation. Comput Biol Med. 2020;123:103823. - PubMed
    1. Huang Q, Luo Y, Zhang Q. Breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey. Int J CARS. 2017;12:493–507. - PubMed
    1. Shen D, Wu G, Suk HI. Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;19:221–248. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xue Y, Xu T, Zhang H, Long LR, Huang X. Segan: adversarial network with multi-scale l 1loss for medical image segmentation. Neuroinformatics. 2018;16:1–10. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources