Hyperbaric prilocaine vs. hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in women undergoing elective caesarean section: a comparative randomised double-blind study
- PMID: 33428221
- DOI: 10.1111/anae.15342
Hyperbaric prilocaine vs. hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in women undergoing elective caesarean section: a comparative randomised double-blind study
Abstract
Hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia remains the gold standard for elective caesarean section, but the resultant clinical effects can be unpredictable. Hyperbaric prilocaine induces shorter motor block but has not previously been studied in the obstetric spinal anaesthesia setting. We aimed to compare duration of motor block after spinal anaesthesia with prilocaine or bupivacaine during elective caesarean section. In this prospective randomised, double-blind study, women with uncomplicated pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included: patients aged < 18 years; height < 155 cm or > 175 cm; a desire to breastfeed; or a contra-indication to spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups: the prilocaine group underwent spinal anaesthesia with 60 mg intrathecal prilocaine; and the bupivacaine group received 12.5 mg intrathecal heavy bupivacaine. Both 2.5 µg sufentanil and 100 µg morphine were added to the local anaesthetic agent in both groups. The primary outcome was duration of motor block, which was assessed every 15 min after arriving in the post-anaesthetic care unit. Maternal haemodynamics, APGAR scores, pain scores, patient satisfaction and side-effects were recorded. Fifty patients were included, with 25 randomly allocated to each group. Median (IQR [range]) motor block duration was significantly shorter in the prilocaine group, 158 (125-188 [95-249]) vs. 220 (189-250 [89-302]) min, p < 0.001. Median length of stay in the post-anaesthetic care unit was significantly shorter in the prilocaine group, 135 (120-180 [120-230]) vs. 180 (150-195 [120-240]) min, p = 0.009. There was no difference between groups for: maternal intra-operative hypotension; APGAR score; umbilical cord blood pH; maternal postoperative pain; and patients' or obstetricians' satisfaction. We conclude that hyperbaric prilocaine induces a shorter and more reliable motor block than hyperbaric bupivacaine for women with uncomplicated pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03433976.
Keywords: caesarean section; motor block; prilocaine; spinal anaesthesia.
© 2021 Association of Anaesthetists.
Comment in
-
Spinal prilocaine for caesarean section: walking a fine line.Anaesthesia. 2021 Jun;76(6):740-742. doi: 10.1111/anae.15341. Epub 2021 Jan 11. Anaesthesia. 2021. PMID: 33428235 No abstract available.
References
-
- Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, et al. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations (part 2). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018; 219: 533-44.
-
- Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 277-84.
-
- Fuchs F, Benhamou D. Post-partum management after cesarean delivery. Guidelines for clinical practice. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 2015; 44: 1111-7.
-
- Brill S, Gurman GM, Fisher A. A history of neuraxial administration of local analgesics and opioids. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2005; 20: 682-9.
-
- Ginosar Y, Cohen SE. ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine coadministered with opioids for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 672-82.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
