In Response
- PMID: 33428342
- DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005420
In Response
Comment on
-
Is Surgical Tracheostomy Better Than Percutaneous Tracheostomy in COVID-19-Positive Patients?Anesth Analg. 2020 Oct;131(4):1000-1005. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005100. Anesth Analg. 2020. PMID: 32925315 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Keeping an Open Mind: Tracheostomy for Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):e90-e92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005419. Anesth Analg. 2021. PMID: 33428341 No abstract available.
References
-
- McGrath BA, Pelosi P, Brenner MJ. Keeping an open mind: tracheostomy for patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Anesth Analg. 2021;132:e90–e92.
-
- Bassi M, Ruberto F, Poggi C, et al. Is surgical tracheostomy better than percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19-positive patients? Anesth Analg. 2020;131:1000–1005.
-
- Bassi M, Anile M, Pecoraro Y, et al. Bedside transcervical-transtracheal postintubation injury repair in a COVID-19 patient. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:e417–e419.
-
- McGrath BA, Brenner MJ, Warrillow SJ, et al. Tracheostomy in the COVID-19 era: global and multidisciplinary guidance. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:717–725.
-
- Brenner MJ, Pandian V, Milliren CE, et al. Global Tracheostomy Collaborative: improving patient safety through teamwork, standardisation, and data. Brit J Anaesth. 2020;125:e104–e118.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
