Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0244961.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244961. eCollection 2021.

Coral growth, survivorship and return-on-effort within nurseries at high-value sites on the Great Barrier Reef

Affiliations

Coral growth, survivorship and return-on-effort within nurseries at high-value sites on the Great Barrier Reef

Lorna Howlett et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Coral reefs are deteriorating worldwide prompting reef managers and stakeholders to increasingly explore new management tools. Following back-to-back bleaching in 2016/2017, multi-taxa coral nurseries were established in 2018 for the first time on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) to aid reef maintenance and restoration at a "high-value" location-Opal Reef-frequented by the tourism industry. Various coral species (n = 11) were propagated within shallow water (ca. 4-7m) platforms installed across two sites characterised by differing environmental exposure-one adjacent to a deep-water channel (Blue Lagoon) and one that was relatively sheltered (RayBan). Growth rates of coral fragments placed onto nurseries were highly variable across taxa but generally higher at Blue Lagoon (2.1-10.8 cm2 month-1 over 12 months) compared to RayBan (0.6-6.6 cm2 month-1 over 9 months). Growth at Blue Lagoon was largely independent of season, except for Acropora tenuis and Acropora hyacinthus, where growth rates were 15-20% higher for December 2018-July 2019 ("warm season") compared to August-December 2018 ("cool season"). Survivorship across all 2,536 nursery fragments was ca. 80-100%, with some species exhibiting higher survivorship at Blue Lagoon (Acropora loripes, Porites cylindrica) and others at RayBan (A. hyacinthus, Montipora hispida). Parallel measurements of growth and survivorship were used to determine relative return-on-effort (RRE) scores as an integrated metric of "success" accounting for life history trade-offs, complementing the mutually exclusive assessment of growth or survivorship. RRE scores within sites (across species) were largely driven by growth, whereas RRE scores between sites were largely driven by survivorship. The initial nursery phase of coral propagation therefore appears useful to supplement coral material naturally available for stewardship of frequently visited Great Barrier Reef tourism (high-value) sites, but further assessment is needed to evaluate how well the growth rates and survival for nursery grown corals translate once material is outplanted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JE is co-owner and LH is an employee of Wavelength Reef Cruises. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
(A) Location of sites on Opal Reef, Great Barrier Reef (Australia), including nursery sites RayBan (RB; 16°13'27"S 145°53'22"E) and Blue Lagoon (BL; 16°12'18"S 145°53'54"E) in relation to their location within the region and country. Delineation of the management zones for Opal Reef (see main text) is indicated by the dashed line. (B) The remotely sensed mean (± standard error, n = 3–4 per month) Sea Surface Temperatures (SST) for Opal Reef. Imposed onto the SST are points showing the time when measurements were taken for both RayBan and Blue Lagoon nurseries.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Comparisons of (A) Growth rates (areal extension; ΔG, cm2 month-1) measured over the full year (August 2018-July 2019) for the 9 coral taxa maintained at Blue Lagoon (BL) nursery: Acropora humilis (A.hum), Acropora hyacinthus (A.hya), Acropora loripes (A.lor), Acropora millepora (A.mill), Acropora intermedia (A.int), Acropora tenuis (A.ten), Montipora hispida (M.his), Porites cylindrica (P.cyl) Pocillopora cf. verrucosa (P.cf.ver). Box plots for ΔG show the interquartile range (representing 50% of data) and mean (horizontal line)–whiskers extend to the maximum and minimum values of data and excluding outliers (lie outside the 10th and 90th percentiles) (B) Mean (± standard error) ΔG of comparative species grown over a full year at BL versus at RayBan (RB; May 2018-February 2019) nurseries; (C) Mean (± standard error) ΔG of species grown at BL for data collection periods August-December 2018, “cool season” (Fig 1), versus December 2018-July 2019, “warm season” (as per S4 Table); (D) Mean (± standard error) for the RRE score of comparative species grown over a full year at BL versus RB (Table 1). Diagonal line in plots (b-d) signify 1:1.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Visual examples of coral growth (Acropora hyacinthus) on the Blue Lagoon coral nursery from (A) 18th October 2018; and then (B) 26th August 2019. Examples of coral growth taken from RayBan nurseries from (C) 22nd October 2018; versus (D) 9th September 2019. Photographs taken by John Edmonsdon.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rinkevich B. Management of coral reefs: we have gone wrong when neglecting active reef restoration. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2008. November 1;56(11):1821–4. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.08.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anthony K, Bay LK, Costanza R, Firn J, Gunn J, Harrison P, et al. New interventions are needed to save coral reefs. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2017. October;1(10):1420–2. 10.1038/s41559-017-0313-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Oppen MJ, Gates RD, Blackall LL, Cantin N, Chakravarti LJ, Chan WY, et al. Shifting paradigms in restoration of the world's coral reefs. Global Change Biology. 2017. September;23(9):3437–48. 10.1111/gcb.13647 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hudson JH, Diaz R. Damage survey and restoration of M/V Wellwood grounding site, Molasses Reef, Key Largo National Marine Sanctuary, Florida. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Coral Reef Symposium. 1988; (2): 231–236.
    1. Bohnsack JA, Sutherland DL. Artificial reef research: a review with recommendations for future priorities. Bulletin of Marine Science. 1985. July 1;37(1):11–39.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources