Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0244722.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244722. eCollection 2021.

The patent buyout price for human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine and the ratio of R&D costs to the patent value

Affiliations

The patent buyout price for human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine and the ratio of R&D costs to the patent value

Mario Songane et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is responsible for almost all of the 570,000 new cases of cervical cancer and approximately 311,000 deaths per year. HPV vaccination is an integral component of the World Health Organization's (WHO) global strategy to fight the disease. However, high vaccine prices enforced through patent protection are limiting vaccine expansion, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. By limiting market power, patent buyouts could reduce vaccine prices and raise HPV vaccination rates while keeping innovation incentives. We estimate the global patent buyout price as the present discounted value (PDV) of the future profit stream over the remaining patent length for Merck's HPV vaccines (Gardasil-4 and 9), which hold 87% of the global HPV vaccine market, in the range of US$ 15.6-27.7 billion (in 2018 US$). The estimated PDV of the profit stream since market introduction amounts to US$ 17.8-42.8 billion and the estimated R&D cost to US$ 1.05-1.21 billion. Thus, we arrive at a ratio of R&D costs to the patent value of the order of 2.5-6.8%. We relate this figure to typical estimates of the probability of success (POS) for clinical trials of vaccines to discuss if patent protection provides Merck with extraordinarily strong price setting power.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang R, Pan W, Jin L, Huang W, Li Y, Wu D, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine against cervical cancer: Opportunity and challenge Vol. 471, Cancer Letters. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2020. p. 88–102. 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Martel C, Plummer M, Vignat J, Franceschi S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int J Cancer [Internet]. 2017. August 15 [cited 2020 Jun 21];141(4):664–70. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5520228/?report = abstract 10.1002/ijc.30716 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar P, Gupta S, Das AM, Das BC. Towards global elimination of cervical cancer in all groups of women [Internet]. Vol. 20, The Lancet Oncology. Lancet Publishing Group; 2019. [cited 2020 Jun 21]. p. e237. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S1470204519301706/fulltext - PubMed
    1. Frisch M, Goodman MT. Human papillomavirus-associated carcinomas in Hawaii and the mainland U.S. Cancer [Internet]. 2000. March 15 [cited 2018 Nov 15];88(6):1464–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10717631 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000315)88:6<1464::aid-cncr26>3.0.co;2-o - DOI - PubMed
    1. Insinga RP, Dasbach EJ, Elbasha EH. Assessing the Annual Economic Burden of Preventing and Treating Anogenital Human Papillomavirus-Related Disease in the US. Pharmacoeconomics [Internet]. 2005. [cited 2018 Nov 8];23(11):1107–22. Available from: 10.2165/00019053-200523110-00004 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances