Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 May;107(3):102802.
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102802. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

Lower early revision rates after uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) than cemented Oxford UKA: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Lower early revision rates after uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) than cemented Oxford UKA: A meta-analysis

Jinhui Ma et al. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May.
Free article

Abstract

Background: UKA has been proved to offer good results in treating patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is still a controversy about the better fixation mode in UKA procedure between cemented and uncemented prosthesis. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of cemented versus uncemented Oxford UKA.

Hypothesis: The study surmised that uncemented Oxford UKA was associated with shorter operation time, higher function scores, lower revision rate and less radiolucency than cemented Oxford UKA.

Methods: A meta-analysis to compare postoperative outcomes between cemented and uncemented Oxford UKA wsa conducted. The primary outcomes included Oxford knee score (OKS), revision rate, and incidence of radiolucency. The secondary outcomes included operation time, knee society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), range of motion (ROM). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China national knowledge infrastructure were searched until April, 2020 to identify studies for including. Relevant data were analyzed using RevMan v5.3.

Results: We identified nine studies involving 901 patients meeting our inclusion criteria. No significant difference of OKS was found in both groups. Compared with cemented group, uncemented Oxford UKA group was associated with lower revision rate (95% CI: 0.90 to 3.73; OR=1.83) and less radiolucent lines (95% CI: 0.79 to 9.52; OR=2.75) after following up for at least 2years. The operation time was significantly shorter by 10.12minutes (95% CI: p<0.00001) in the uncemented group when compared against the cemented group. The KSS, WOMAC, ROM were not significantly different between two groups.

Conclusions: Uncemented Oxford UKA had lower revision rate, shorter operation time and less radiolucent lines than cemented Oxford UKA did. There is still need for more long follow-up clinical trials with high evidence level to determine which method of fixation is of preferable for Oxford UKA in the future.

Level of evidence: I.

Keywords: Cemented; Knee prosthesis; Uncemented; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources