Lower early revision rates after uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) than cemented Oxford UKA: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 33429085
- DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102802
Lower early revision rates after uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) than cemented Oxford UKA: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: UKA has been proved to offer good results in treating patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is still a controversy about the better fixation mode in UKA procedure between cemented and uncemented prosthesis. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of cemented versus uncemented Oxford UKA.
Hypothesis: The study surmised that uncemented Oxford UKA was associated with shorter operation time, higher function scores, lower revision rate and less radiolucency than cemented Oxford UKA.
Methods: A meta-analysis to compare postoperative outcomes between cemented and uncemented Oxford UKA wsa conducted. The primary outcomes included Oxford knee score (OKS), revision rate, and incidence of radiolucency. The secondary outcomes included operation time, knee society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), range of motion (ROM). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China national knowledge infrastructure were searched until April, 2020 to identify studies for including. Relevant data were analyzed using RevMan v5.3.
Results: We identified nine studies involving 901 patients meeting our inclusion criteria. No significant difference of OKS was found in both groups. Compared with cemented group, uncemented Oxford UKA group was associated with lower revision rate (95% CI: 0.90 to 3.73; OR=1.83) and less radiolucent lines (95% CI: 0.79 to 9.52; OR=2.75) after following up for at least 2years. The operation time was significantly shorter by 10.12minutes (95% CI: p<0.00001) in the uncemented group when compared against the cemented group. The KSS, WOMAC, ROM were not significantly different between two groups.
Conclusions: Uncemented Oxford UKA had lower revision rate, shorter operation time and less radiolucent lines than cemented Oxford UKA did. There is still need for more long follow-up clinical trials with high evidence level to determine which method of fixation is of preferable for Oxford UKA in the future.
Level of evidence: I.
Keywords: Cemented; Knee prosthesis; Uncemented; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4391-4403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05539-4. Epub 2024 Sep 19. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39294529
-
Hybrid fixation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty shows equivalent short-term implant survivorship and clinical scores compared to standard fixation techniques.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4401-4409. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04710-z. Epub 2022 Dec 2. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 36459235
-
Did a New Design of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Prosthesis Result in Improved Survival? A Study From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2012-2021.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Sep 1;481(9):1703-1712. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002671. Epub 2023 May 30. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 37140943 Free PMC article.
-
Knee Scores of Patients with Non-Lateral Compartmental Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Mobile, Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan;14(1):73-87. doi: 10.1111/os.13111. Epub 2021 Dec 6. Orthop Surg. 2022. PMID: 34870364 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Comparison of Mobile- and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties in the Treatment of Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 1,861 Patients.J Knee Surg. 2021 Mar;34(4):434-443. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697901. Epub 2019 Sep 30. J Knee Surg. 2021. PMID: 31569258
Cited by
-
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4391-4403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05539-4. Epub 2024 Sep 19. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39294529
-
How to manage and avoid revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?World J Clin Cases. 2024 Nov 6;12(31):6428-6430. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i31.6428. World J Clin Cases. 2024. PMID: 39507112 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the causes of primary revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A case series.World J Clin Cases. 2024 Mar 26;12(9):1560-1568. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i9.1560. World J Clin Cases. 2024. PMID: 38576738 Free PMC article.
-
Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation under valgus stress force radiography is useful for evaluating postoperative coronal tibiofemoral subluxation in mobile-bearing UKA.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4349-4361. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04666-0. Epub 2022 Oct 28. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 36305966
-
Hybrid fixation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty shows equivalent short-term implant survivorship and clinical scores compared to standard fixation techniques.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4401-4409. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04710-z. Epub 2022 Dec 2. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 36459235
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous