Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Mar;7(2):111-142.
doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0702_1. Epub 2005 Mar 1.

Relations Among Spontaneous Preferences, Familiarized Preferences, and Novelty Effects: Measurements With Forced-Choice Techniques

Affiliations

Relations Among Spontaneous Preferences, Familiarized Preferences, and Novelty Effects: Measurements With Forced-Choice Techniques

Andrea Civan et al. Infancy. 2005 Mar.

Abstract

We here describe a discrete trial, forced-choice, combined spontaneous preference and novelty preference technique. In this technique, spontaneous preferences and familiarized (postfamiliarization) preferences are measured with the same stimulus pairs under closely parallel conditions. A variety of systematic stimulus variations were used in 16-week-old infants to explore the interrelations among spontaneous preferences, familiarized preferences, and familiarization (novelty) effects. Infants were exposed to pairs of 10° red and blue disks of varying colorimetric purity generated on a video monitor. Pairs of disks were identified for which spontaneous preferences were balanced at about 50-50 or unbalanced at about 75-25, and the magnitudes of familiarized preferences were determined. When spontaneous preferences were balanced at 50-50, novelty effects increased with increasing chromatic separation between the 2 stimuli, showing the independence of these variables. When spontaneous preferences were unbalanced, novelty effects were asymmetrical, being large after familiarization to the spontaneously preferred stimulus, but small or nonexistent after familiarization to the spontaneously nonpreferred stimulus. The potential uses of combined spontaneous preference and novelty preference techniques are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCE

    1. Adams, R. J. (1987). An evaluation of color preference in early infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 143-150.
    1. Adams. R. J., & Courage, M. L. (1998). Human newborn color vision: Measurement with chromatic-stimuli varying in excitation purity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 22-34.
    1. Banks, M. S., & Ginsburg, A. P. (1985). Infant visual preferences: A review and a new theoretical treatment. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 207-246). New York: Academic.
    1. Berlyne, D. E. (1958). The influence of the albedo and complexity of stimuli on visual fixation in the human infant. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 315-318.
    1. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.

LinkOut - more resources