Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jan 11;25(1):25.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03460-5.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients with COVID-19

Affiliations
Observational Study

Ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients with COVID-19

Mailis Maes et al. Crit Care. .

Erratum in

  • Correction to: Ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
    Maes M, Higginson E, Pereira-Dias J, Curran MD, Parmar S, Khokhar F, Cuchet-Lourenço D, Lux J, Sharma-Hajela S, Ravenhill B, Hamed I, Heales L, Mahroof R, Soderholm A, Forrest S, Sridhar S, Brown NM, Baker S, Navapurkar V, Dougan G, Scott JB, Morris AC. Maes M, et al. Crit Care. 2021 Apr 6;25(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03560-2. Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 33823901 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Pandemic COVID-19 caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has a high incidence of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Many of these patients require admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for invasive ventilation and are at significant risk of developing a secondary, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Objectives: To study the incidence of VAP and bacterial lung microbiome composition of ventilated COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we compared the incidence of VAP and secondary infections using a combination of microbial culture and a TaqMan multi-pathogen array. In addition, we determined the lung microbiome composition using 16S RNA analysis in a subset of samples. The study involved 81 COVID-19 and 144 non-COVID-19 patients receiving invasive ventilation in a single University teaching hospital between March 15th 2020 and August 30th 2020.

Results: COVID-19 patients were significantly more likely to develop VAP than patients without COVID (Cox proportional hazard ratio 2.01 95% CI 1.14-3.54, p = 0.0015) with an incidence density of 28/1000 ventilator days versus 13/1000 for patients without COVID (p = 0.009). Although the distribution of organisms causing VAP was similar between the two groups, and the pulmonary microbiome was similar, we identified 3 cases of invasive aspergillosis amongst the patients with COVID-19 but none in the non-COVID-19 cohort. Herpesvirade activation was also numerically more frequent amongst patients with COVID-19.

Conclusion: COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of VAP, which is not fully explained by the prolonged duration of ventilation. The pulmonary dysbiosis caused by COVID-19, and the causative organisms of secondary pneumonia observed are similar to that seen in critically ill patients ventilated for other reasons.

Keywords: COVID-19; Critical care; Molecular diagnostics; Nosocomial infections; SARS-CoV-2; Ventilator-associated pneumonia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Criteria used for the diagnosis of VAP. Adapted from the European Centre for Disease Control definitions to meet local thresholds for quantitative culture of endotracheal aspirate and for the inclusion of molecular detection of pathogens. Ct-cycles to threshold by quantitative PCR
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time to development of VAP in patients with and without COVID-19 censored for death or extubation. P value and hazard ratio by Cox proportional hazards. Numbers at risk at each time point indicated below x-axis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Causative organisms of VAP in patients with and without COVID-19. Non-pathogenic organisms detected above threshold levels shown in grey
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Microbial composition of BAL samples from SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients. Bacterial 16S genes were sequenced and classified to the genus level using Kraken2. The number and percent of reads mapping to each genus is shown for individual samples from each patient (A), with kit controls in the first two columns, and longitudinal samples (1, 2 or 3) from individual patients (B). Individuals were classified as either COVID-19 negative, COVID-19 positive, or recovering (previously diagnosed with COVID-19 but SARS-CoV-2 negative at time of sample)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goyal P, Choi JJ, Pinheiro LC, et al. Clinical characteristics of covid-19 in New York City. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2372–2374. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323:1574–1578. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vincent J-L, Sakr Y, Singer M, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of infection among patients in intensive care units in 2017. JAMA. 2020;323:1478–1510. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Álvarez-Lerma F, Palomar-Martínez M, Sánchez-García M, et al. Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(2):181–188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morris AC, Datta D, Shankar-Hari M, et al. Cell-surface signatures of immune dysfunction risk-stratify critically ill patients: INFECT study. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:627–635. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types