Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Nov;164(5):1426-1438.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.152. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

A randomized trial comparing axillary versus innominate artery cannulation for aortic arch surgery

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized trial comparing axillary versus innominate artery cannulation for aortic arch surgery

Mark D Peterson et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Cerebral protection remains the cornerstone of successful aortic surgery; however, there is no consensus as to the optimal strategy.

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of innominate to axillary artery cannulation for delivering antegrade cerebral protection during proximal aortic arch surgery.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial (The Aortic Surgery Cerebral Protection Evaluation CardioLink-3 Trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02554032), conducted across 6 Canadian centers between January 2015 and June 2018, allocated 111 individuals to innominate or axillary artery cannulation. The primary safety outcome was neuroprotection per the appearance of new severe ischemic lesions on the postoperative diffusion-weighted-magnetic resonance imaging. The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in total operative time. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality and postoperative stroke.

Results: One hundred two individuals (mean age, 63 ± 11 years) were in the primary safety per-protocol analysis. Baseline characteristics between the groups were similar. New severe ischemic lesions occurred in 19 participants (38.8%) in the axillary versus 18 (34%) in the innominate group (P for noninferiority = .0009). Total operative times were comparable (median, 293 minutes; interquartile range, 222-411 minutes) for axillary versus (298 minutes; interquartile range, 231-368 minutes) for innominate (P for superiority = .47). Stroke/transient ischemic attack occurred in 4 (7.1%) participants in the axillary versus 2 (3.6%) in the innominate group (P = .43). Thirty-day mortality, seizures, delirium, and duration of mechanical ventilation were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging assessments indicate that antegrade cerebral protection with innominate cannulation is safe and affords similar neuroprotection to axillary cannulation during aortic surgery, although the burden of new neurological lesions is high in both groups.

Keywords: antegrade cerebral protection; axillary artery cannulation; cardiopulmonary bypass; deep hypothermic circulatory arrest; diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; innominate artery cannulation; new ischemic brain lesions; replacement of the ascending aorta; transient ischemic attack.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

Associated data