Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;62(5):610-630.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13372. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Annual Research Review: Anterior Modifiers in the Emergence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (AMEND)-a systems neuroscience approach to common developmental disorders

Affiliations
Review

Annual Research Review: Anterior Modifiers in the Emergence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (AMEND)-a systems neuroscience approach to common developmental disorders

Mark H Johnson et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 May.

Abstract

We present the Anterior Modifiers in the Emergence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (AMEND) framework, designed to reframe the field of prospective studies of neurodevelopmental disorders. In AMEND we propose conceptual, statistical and methodological approaches to separating markers of early-stage perturbations from later developmental modifiers. We describe the evidence for, and features of, these interacting components before outlining analytical approaches to studying how different profiles of early perturbations and later modifiers interact to produce phenotypic outcomes. We suggest this approach could both advance our theoretical understanding and clinical approach to the emergence of developmental psychopathology in early childhood.

Keywords: Neurodevelopmental disorders; autism spectrum disorders; brain development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the analysis steps motivated by the AMEND framework. Arrows A1 to A3 are described in the text. Colour green indicates the influence of initial factors and Early Stage Processing, while blue indicates the influence of Neurocognitive modifiers. Phenotypic outcomes are represented on the right hand side as resulting from a combination of these factors
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of a random‐intercept cross‐lagged model to examine how executive attention might over time (through the red paths), reduce the magnitude of (purple) paths that reflect the cumulative impact of an early‐stage marker on later phenotypic outcome

Comment in

References

    1. Ahn, A.C. , Tewari, M. , Poon, C.‐S. , & Phillips, R.S. (2006). The limits of reductionism in medicine: Could systems biology offer an alternative? PLoS Medicine, 3, e208. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aiken, C.E. , & Ozanne, S.E. (2013). Sex differences in developmental programming models. Reproduction (Cambridge, England), 145, R1–13. - PubMed
    1. Alvarez, J.A. , & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta‐analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 17–42. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, DSM‐5. Washington, DC.
    1. Anagnostou, E. , & Taylor, M.J. (2011). Review of neuroimaging in autism spectrum disorders: What have we learned and where we go from here. Molecular Autism, 2, 4. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources