Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes
- PMID: 33433574
- PMCID: PMC7804915
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.23718
Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes
Abstract
Importance: In in vitro fertilization cycles using autologous oocytes, data have demonstrated higher live birth rates following cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers compared with fresh embryo transfers. It remains unknown if this association exists in cycles using freshly retrieved donor oocytes.
Objective: To test the hypothesis that in freshly retrieved donor oocyte cycles, a fresh embryo transfer is more likely to result in a live birth compared with a cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer.
Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective cohort study using national data collected from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology for 33 863 recipients undergoing fresh donor oocyte cycles in the US between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017.
Exposures: Fresh embryo transfer and cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was live birth rate; secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. Analyses were adjusted for donor age, day of embryo transfer, use of a gestational carrier, and assisted hatching.
Results: Recipients of fresh and cryopreserved-thawed embryos had comparable median age (42.0 [interquartile range {IQR}, 37.0-44.0] years vs 42.0 [IQR, 36.0-45.0] years), gravidity (1 [IQR, 0-2] vs 1 [IQR, 0-3]), parity (0 [IQR, 0-1] vs 1 [IQR, 0-1]), and body mass index (24.5 [IQR, 21.9-28.7] vs 24.4 [IQR, 21.6-28.7]). Of a total of 33 863 recipients who underwent 51 942 fresh donor oocyte cycles, there were 15 308 (29.5%) fresh embryo transfer cycles and 36 634 (70.5%) cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Blastocysts were transferred in 92.4% of fresh embryo transfer cycles and 96.5% of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer cycles, with no significant difference in the mean number of embryos transferred. Live birth rate following fresh embryo transfer vs cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer was 56.6% vs 44.0% (absolute difference, 12.6% [95% CI, 11.7%-13.5%]; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.39-1.46]). Clinical pregnancy rates were 66.7% vs 54.2%, respectively (absolute difference, 12.5% [95% CI, 11.6%-13.4%]; aRR, 1.34; [95% CI, 1.31-1.37]). Miscarriage rates were 9.3% vs 9.4%, respectively (absolute difference, 0.2% [95% CI, -0.4% to 0.7%]); aRR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.91-1.07]).
Conclusions and relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of women undergoing assisted reproduction using freshly retrieved donor oocytes, the use of fresh embryo transfers compared with cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers was associated with a higher live birth rate. However, interpretation of the findings is limited by the potential for selection and confounding bias.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis.Fertil Steril. 2022 Apr;117(4):803-810. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 23. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 35216830
-
Association Between Fresh Embryo Transfers and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfers Regarding Live Birth Rates Among Women Undergoing Long Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocols.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Apr 28;10:884677. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.884677. eCollection 2022. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022. PMID: 35573703 Free PMC article.
-
Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan;107(1):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 11. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 27842997 Free PMC article.
-
Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):CD006359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006359.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33112418 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.Fertil Steril. 2021 Jul;116(1):36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.024. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 34148587 Review.
Cited by
-
Early Spontaneous Abortion in Fresh- and Frozen-Embryo Transfers: An Analysis of Over 35,000 Transfer Cycles.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 27;13:875798. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.875798. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35832421 Free PMC article.
-
Donor sperm recipients: fertility treatments, trends, and pregnancy outcomes.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Oct;39(10):2303-2310. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02616-8. Epub 2022 Sep 12. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022. PMID: 36089627 Free PMC article.
-
Vitrification affects the post-implantation development of mouse embryos by inducing DNA damage and epigenetic modifications.Clin Epigenetics. 2025 Feb 7;17(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01826-y. Clin Epigenetics. 2025. PMID: 39920865 Free PMC article.
-
Update on the Epigenomic Implication of Embryo Cryopreservation Methods Applied in Assisted Reproductive Technologies With Potential Long-Term Health Effects.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Apr 28;10:881550. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.881550. eCollection 2022. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022. PMID: 35573677 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The evolving landscape of donor egg treatment: success, women's choice, and anonymity.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Sep;38(9):2327-2332. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02262-6. Epub 2021 Jun 20. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021. PMID: 34148151 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report Published 2016. Accessed January 27, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/art/reports/
-
- Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Final National Summary Report for 2017. Accessed January 27, 2020. https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?reportingYear=...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources