Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 12;23(2):9.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01437-4.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Genetic Testing and Risk Stratification

Fergus Stafford  1 , Kate Thomson  2   3 , Alexandra Butters  1   4 , Jodie Ingles  5   6   7
Affiliations
Review

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Genetic Testing and Risk Stratification

Fergus Stafford et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Our knowledge of the genetic basis and molecular pathogenesis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) continues to evolve. We describe the genetic basis of HCM, recent advances in genetic testing and the role of genetics in guiding risk stratification and management, both now and in the future.

Recent findings: While initially thought to be an exclusively Mendelian disease, we now know there are important HCM sub-groups. A proportion will have sarcomere variants as the cause of their disease, while others will have genetic variants in genes that can give rise to conditions that can mimic HCM. The role of genetics is primarily for cascade genetic testing, though there is emerging evidence of a role for prognosis and patient management. Genetic testing is a useful addition to management. Genotype may play a greater role in risk stratification, management, treatment and prognosis in future, offering improved outcomes for patients and their families with HCM.

Keywords: Genetics; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Management; Risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
    1. Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Kurosaki TT, Bild DE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults. Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA study. Coronary artery risk development in (young) adults. Circulation. 1995;92(4):785–9. - PubMed
    1. Semsarian C, Ingles J, Maron MS, Maron BJ. New perspectives on the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(12):1249–54. - PubMed
    1. Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA, Borggrefe M, Cecchi F, Charron P, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the task force for the diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(39):2733–79. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Mazzarotto F, Olivotto I, Boschi B, Girolami F, Poggesi C, Barton PJR, et al. Contemporary insights into the genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: toward a new era in clinical testing? J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(8):e015473. - PubMed - PMC
    1. •• Ho CY, Day SM, Ashley EA, Michels M, Pereira AC, Jacoby D, et al. Genotype and lifetime burden of disease in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: insights from the sarcomeric human cardiomyopathy registry (SHaRe). Circulation. 2018;138(14):1387–98 Findings from this study demonstrate that outcomes in individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may vary significantly by genotype in one of the largest patient cohorts to date. - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources