Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Mar 1;91(2):178-186.
doi: 10.2319/060820-527.1.

Orthopedic outcomes of hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders

Randomized Controlled Trial

Orthopedic outcomes of hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders

Daniela Garib et al. Angle Orthod. .

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effects of a hybrid miniscrew-supported expander versus a conventional Hyrax (CH) expander in growing patients.

Materials and methods: Forty patients were randomized into two groups: a hybrid Hyrax (HH) expander group using a Hyrax expander with two miniscrews and a CH expander group. The final sample had 18 subjects (8 female, 10 male; initial age of 10.8 years) in the HH group and 14 subjects (6 female, 8 male; initial age of 11.4 years) in the CH group. Cone-beam computed tomography examinations and digital dental models were obtained before expansion and 11 months postexpansion. The primary outcomes included the orthopedic transverse effects of expansion. Intergroup comparison was performed using analysis of covariance (P < .05).

Results: Significantly greater increases in the nasal cavity width, maxillary width, and buccal alveolar crest width were found for the HH group. No intergroup differences were observed for dental arch width or shape changes.

Conclusions: The HH group showed greater increases in the nasal cavity width, maxillary width, and buccal alveolar crest width. No differences were observed for intermolar, interpremolar, or intercanine widths; arch length; or arch perimeter. Arch size and shape showed similar changes in both groups.

Keywords: Dental models; Imaging; Interceptive; Orthodontic appliance; Orthodontics; Palatal expansion technique; Three-dimensional.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT flow chart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Hybrid Hyrax expander group. (B) Conventional Hyrax expander group.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Miniscrews installed with a 45° inclination in the paramedian anterior palate in a subject using the hybrid expander.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(A) Coronal slice showing the transverse measurements (Table 1). (B) Transverse measurements performed on the digital dental models (Table 1). (C) Landmarks used for arch shape analysis.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(A) Intergroup comparison of preexpansion arch shape. (B) Intergroup comparison of postexpansion arch shape. (C, D) Arch shape before (black line) and after expansion (gray) in the hybrid (C) and conventional Hyrax (D) groups.

References

    1. Haas AJ. The treatment of maxillary deficiency by opening the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod. 1965;35:200–217. - PubMed
    1. Lee KJ, Park YC, Park JY, Hwang WS. Miniscrew-assisted nonsurgical palatal expansion before orthognathic surgery for a patient with severe mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:830–839. - PubMed
    1. Wilmes B, Nienkemper M, Drescher D. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid Hyrax. World J Orthod. 2010;11:323–330. - PubMed
    1. Garib DG, Navarro R, Francischone CE, Oltramari PV. Rapid maxillary expansion using palatal implants. J Clin Orthod. 2008;42:665–671. - PubMed
    1. Choi SH, Shi KK, Cha JY, Park YC, Lee KJ. Nonsurgical miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion results in acceptable stability in young adults. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:713–720. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources