Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 9;18(2):486.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020486.

Demographic and Risk Factor Differences between Children with "One-Time" and "Repeat" Visits to the Emergency Department for Asthma

Pavani Rangachari  1 , Jie Chen  2 , Nishtha Ahuja  3 , Anjeli Patel  3 , Renuka Mehta  4
Affiliations

Demographic and Risk Factor Differences between Children with "One-Time" and "Repeat" Visits to the Emergency Department for Asthma

Pavani Rangachari et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This retrospective study examines demographic and risk factor differences between children who visited the emergency department (ED) for asthma once ("one-time") and more than once ("repeat") over an 18-month period at an academic medical center. The purpose is to contribute to the literature on ED utilization for asthma and provide a foundation for future primary research on self-management effectiveness (SME) of childhood asthma. For the first round of analysis, an 18-month retrospective chart review was conducted on 252 children (0-17 years) who visited the ED for asthma in 2019-2020, to obtain data on demographics, risk factors, and ED visits for each child. Of these, 160 (63%) were "one-time" and 92 (37%) were "repeat" ED patients. Demographic and risk factor differences between "one-time" and "repeat" ED patients were assessed using contingency table and logistic regression analyses. A second round of analysis was conducted on patients in the age-group 8-17 years to match another retrospective asthma study recently completed in the outpatient clinics at the same (study) institution. The first-round analysis indicated that except age, none of the individual demographic or risk factors were statistically significant in predicting of "repeat" ED visits. More unequivocally, the second-round analysis revealed that none of the individual factors examined (including age, race, gender, insurance, and asthma severity, among others) were statistically significant in predicting "repeat" ED visits for childhood asthma. A key implication of the results therefore is that something other than the factors examined is driving "repeat" ED visits in children with asthma. In addition to contributing to the ED utilization literature, the results serve to corroborate findings from the recent outpatient study and bolster the impetus for future primary research on SME of childhood asthma.

Keywords: asthma management; emergency department; evidence-based practice guidelines; healthcare utilization; pediatric asthma; self-management effectiveness; “holistic framework”.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for Round 1 and Round 2 analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johnson L.H., Chambers P., Dexheimer J.W. Asthma-related emergency department use: Current perspectives. Open Access Emerg. Med. 2016;8:47–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Asthma self-management education and environmental management: Approaches to enhancing reimbursement. National Asthma Control Program, CDC; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2014.
    1. Inserro A. CDC Study Puts Economic Burden of Asthma at More Than $80 Billion per Year. [(accessed on 15 May 2020)];2018 Available online: https://www.ajmc.com/view/cdc-study-puts-economic-burden-of-asthma-at-mo....
    1. National Institutes of Health National Asthma Education & Prevention Program . Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Expert Panel Report 3. United States Department of Health and Human Services; Washington, DC, USA: 2007.
    1. Pinnock H., Parke H.L., Panagioti M., Daines L., Pearce G., Epiphaniou E., Bower P., Sheikh A., Griffiths C.J., Taylor S.J.C., et al. Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: A healthcare perspective. BMC Med. 2017;15:1–32. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0823-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed