Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 8;9(1):136.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010136.

New Clinical Applications of Electrolyzed Water: A Review

Affiliations
Review

New Clinical Applications of Electrolyzed Water: A Review

Pianpian Yan et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

As the situation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still deteriorating, there has been a huge increase in the demand and use of disinfectants. Electrolyzed water (EW), as a novel broad-spectrum disinfectant and cleaner, has been widely used for several years. EW can be produced in an electrolysis chamber which contains dilute salt and tap water. It is an effective antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent, with several advantages such as on-the-spot, cheap, environmentally friendly and safe for human beings. Therefore, EW holds potential significance for high-risk settings in hospitals and other clinical facilities. EW can also be applied for wound healing, advanced tissue care, and dental clinics. The present review article highlights the latest developments and new perspectives of EW, especially in clinical fields. Furthermore, the main action modes of antibiofilm and antimicrobial will be summarized.

Keywords: antibiofilm; antimicrobial effect; clinical application; electrolyzed water; oral hygiene; wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Application of electrolyzed water (EW) at different pH values in various fields.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Generation of electrolyzed water. (A): alkaline electrolyzed water and acidic electrolyzed water; (B): slightly acidic electrolyzed water. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Factors affecting the decontamination efficacy of electrolyzed water. ACC: available chlorine concentration; ORP: oxidation–reduction potential.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Model representing the mechanism of electrolyzed water. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Model representing the mechanism of electrolyzed water on wounds. Created with BioRender.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yeshambel A., Endalamaw A., Belay D.M., Mekonen D.K., Birhan B.M., Bayih W.A. Healthcare-associated infection and its determinants in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0241073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241073. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiner-Lastinger L.M., Abner S., Edwards J.R., Kallen A.J., Karlsson M., Magill S.S., Pollock D., See I., Soe M.M., Walters M.S., et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with adult healthcare-associated infections: Summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2015–2017. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2019;41:1–18. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.296. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Savetamal A. Infection in Elderly Burn Patients: What Do We Know? Surg. Infect. 2020;21 doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.322. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chyderiotis S., Legeay C., Verjat-Trannoy D., Le Gallou F., Astagneau P., Lepelletier D. New insights on antimi-crobial efficacy of copper surfaces in the healthcare environment: A systematic review. Clin. Microbiol. Infec. 2018;24:1130–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Habibi A., Safaiefarahani B. Indoor Damp Surfaces Harbor Molds with Clinical Significance. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2018;4:1–9. doi: 10.18502/cmm.4.3.169. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources