Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520969478.
doi: 10.1177/0300060520969478.

Revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using cemented arthroplasty: a mean 10-year follow-up of 157 consecutive patients

Affiliations

Revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using cemented arthroplasty: a mean 10-year follow-up of 157 consecutive patients

Jinluan Lin et al. J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: This study was performed to assess the outcomes of Asian patients who underwent conversion from metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM-THA) to cemented THA (CTHA).

Methods: One hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients (157 hips) who underwent CTHA following primary MoM-THA from January 2005 to February 2015 were retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoints were the clinical outcomes. Follow-ups occurred at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and then every 2 years following revision of MoM-THA.

Results: The mean follow-up after conversion was 10 years (range, 5-14 years). Statistically significant improvements in the mean Harris hip score were observed between the preoperative and final follow-up evaluations (62.71 ± 13.85 vs. 84.03 ± 16.21, respectively). The major orthopaedic complication rate was 16.5% (26/157). Six (3.8%) patients underwent revision at a mean of 3.5 ± 1.3 years after conversion, predominantly because of prosthesis loosening or recurrent dislocation. Nine (5.7%) patients developed prosthesis loosening at a mean of 2.6 ± 1.1 years following conversion, two of whom requested revision surgery. Eleven (7.0%) patients developed prosthesis dislocation, four of whom requested revision surgery.

Conclusion: CTHA may yield favourable functional outcomes and a reduced rate of major orthopaedic complications.

Keywords: Conversion; complication; metal-on-metal; outcome; revision; total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient flow diagram. MoM-THA, metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; CTHA, cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lainiala OS, Reito AP, Nieminen JJ, et al. Declining revision burden of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 2058–2064.e1. - PubMed
    1. Jennings JM, White S, Martin JR, et al. Revisions of modular metal-on-metal THA have a high risk of early complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477: 344–350. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crawford DA, Adams JB, Morris MJ, et al. Revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: midterm outcomes of 203 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 1755–1760. - PubMed
    1. Borton ZM, Mumith AS, Nicholls AJ, et al. The outcome of revision surgery for failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 1749–1754. - PubMed
    1. Mata-Fink A, Philipson DJ, Keeney BJ, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after revision of metal-on-metal total bearings in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 1241–1244. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources