Detection of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in outpatients: A multicenter comparison of self-collected saline gargle, oral swab, and combined oral-anterior nasal swab to a provider collected nasopharyngeal swab
- PMID: 33436122
- PMCID: PMC7870921
- DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.2
Detection of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in outpatients: A multicenter comparison of self-collected saline gargle, oral swab, and combined oral-anterior nasal swab to a provider collected nasopharyngeal swab
Abstract
Background: Widespread testing for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is necessary to curb the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but testing is undermined when the only option is a nasopharyngeal swab. Self-collected swab techniques can overcome many of the disadvantages of a nasopharyngeal swab, but they require evaluation.
Methods: Three self-collected non-nasopharyngeal swab techniques (saline gargle, oral swab and combined oral-anterior nasal swab) were compared to a nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 detection at multiple COVID-19 assessment centers in Toronto, Canada. The performance characteristics of each test were assessed.
Results: The adjusted sensitivity of the saline gargle was 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94), the oral swab was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89) and the combined oral-anterior nasal swab was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.93) compared to a nasopharyngeal swab, which demonstrated a sensitivity of ˜90% when all positive tests were the reference standard. The median cycle threshold values for the SARS-CoV-2 E-gene for concordant and discordant saline gargle specimens were 17 and 31 (P < .001), for the oral swabs these values were 17 and 28 (P < .001), and for oral-anterior nasal swabs these values were 18 and 31 (P = .007).
Conclusions: Self-collected saline gargle and an oral-anterior nasal swab have a similar sensitivity to a nasopharyngeal swab for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. These alternative collection techniques are cheap and can eliminate barriers to testing, particularly in underserved populations.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Self-Collected Saline Gargle Samples as an Alternative to Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Outpatients.J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Mar 19;59(4):e02427-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02427-20. Print 2021 Mar 19. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33514627 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Gargle, Spit, and Sputum Specimens.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0003521. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00035-21. Epub 2021 Aug 25. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34431686 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Detection.Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3106-e3109. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1589. Clin Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33075138 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative clinical specimens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review.Rev Med Virol. 2021 Jul;31(4):e2185. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2185. Epub 2020 Oct 22. Rev Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 33091200 Review.
-
Nasopharyngeal versus nasal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review.Rhinology. 2021 Oct 1;59(5):410-421. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.162. Rhinology. 2021. PMID: 34666340
Cited by
-
Prospective, clinical comparison of self-collected throat-bilateral nares swabs and saline gargle compared to health care provider collected nasopharyngeal swabs among symptomatic outpatients with potential SARS-CoV-2 infection.J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2024 Jan 16;8(4):283-298. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2023-0002. eCollection 2024 Jan. J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2024. PMID: 38250616 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Non-Invasive Gargle Lavage Sampling for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using rRT-PCR or Antigen Assay.Viruses. 2022 Dec 19;14(12):2829. doi: 10.3390/v14122829. Viruses. 2022. PMID: 36560833 Free PMC article.
-
Saliva Has High Sensitivity and Specificity for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Compared to Nasal Swabs but Exhibits Different Viral Dynamics from Days of Symptom Onset.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;15(15):1918. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151918. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40804882 Free PMC article.
-
Natural spring water gargle samples as an alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection using a laboratory-developed test.J Med Virol. 2022 Mar;94(3):985-993. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27407. Epub 2021 Nov 3. J Med Virol. 2022. PMID: 34672374 Free PMC article.
-
User acceptability of saliva and gargle samples for identifying COVID-19 positive high-risk workers and household contacts.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;104(1):115732. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115732. Epub 2022 May 26. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35728458 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Marty FM, Chen K, Verrill KA. How to obtain a nasopharyngeal swab specimen. N Engl J Med 2020. 28;382(22):e76. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous